RE: I'm sorry but................2 Nov 2020 15:29
Hi Sooty et al,
I think there's maybe more of an arbitrage opportunity here than people think, that is , GLEN buying ZIOC with a view to a 'flip'...and maybe quite a profitable one.
This, I think , is why :
-GLEN has right of first refusal, which will be a powerful disincentive to any 3rd party suitor, both GLEN and ZIOC will be aware of this;
- any suitor knows that (provisional) agreement with ZIOC still leaves uncertainty as to GLEN's intentions/price;
- Elphick is likely a motivated seller : his other public investment, Gem Diamonds , has not performed well : https://www.miningmx.com/rainmakers/profile/26
.."That familiar tune you may be hearing in the back of your mind – assuming you are old enough to remember it – while reviewing the history of GEM Diamonds is by Mary Hopkin and it runs: “Those were the days my friend/We thought they’d never end/We’d sing and dance for ever and a day”. So it must have seemed for Elphick and his backers when he launched GEM on the London Stock Exchange in 2007 when he raised £285m and the company was worth around $1bn. Fast forward to December last year when GEM had a market capitalisation of around $94m, today Nov 2020 abt $ 65m...
So, what happened? Well, Elphick took that £285m and bought a string of mines including Ellendale in Australia; Cempaka in Indonesia; and Ghaghoo in Botswana. GEM no longer owns any of them because they failed leaving it with its original asset, the Letseng mine in Lesotho. The failure that has to hurt the most is Ghaghoo because that was on Elphick’s own turf in the heartland of global diamond mining, Botswana. GEM has survived thanks mainly to the recovery of high-quality large diamonds from Letseng for which prices have remained decent in stark contrast to the drop in prices being paid for diamonds at the cheaper end of the spectrum....";
I haven't worked out what his stake in GEMD is today. I'm guessing Gem Diamonds Holdings (6.7%), the major II's have about 60%.
- over at ZIOC, meanwhile, he has a chunkier stake, around 27% or 80 million shares. There are quite a lot more shares that are/were in the hands of early -day investors (Howarth, etc)
- As previously mentioned, there was a Director's placing at the same time as the IPO, where I reckon that the promotors likely got their investment back, in other words, these shares are a 'free carry'.
- On the basis of what's readily available re Elphick's likely Net Worth, I'd think £1 a share - £ 80 million - would be quite acceptable, thank you. And the same would likely be the case for a critical majority of shareholders.
GLEN could say £ 1, take it or leave it....and then onsell for 2 to 3 x without batting an eyelid or losing a wink of sleep.
All IMO
Thoughts welcome !
ATB