RE: Silver: the seductive distraction - A Warning!3 Jan 2026 14:52
Speedy, from my readings on the topic, if a trader asks for physical delivery upon settlement of their futures contract, Comex are within their rights to cash settle without being in default. The problem with Comex choosing to cash settle would be that the cat would then be out of the proverbial bag, and everyone (who doesn't already) would realise that Comex is a bit of a house of cards.
If confidence is lost and more and more traders ask for physical settlement, inventories are drained (unless replenished by buying physical silver at higher prices, which further drives up the spot price) until they have to move to wholesale cash settlement, at which point it is clear to everyone that this is a distorted / unreliable market and anyone who actually cares about physical ownership / delivery moves off Comex entirely. Andrew Maguire has presented lots of great analysis on this, which shows that many users of physical silver have already moved away from using Comex (many users are even signing bilateral deals with silver miners) and that any move to cash settlement will just exacerbate this further.
Comex can run like it has done because the vast majority of the contracts are never settled through physical delivery. This is unproblematic when the metal is in abundant supply, both through surplus production and massive above ground inventories. When supply becomes tight, due to five years of supply deficits, and there is a precious metals bull run in which silver's dual purpose as a monetary metal starts shining, investors want to make sure that the physical is really there. If there is a loss in confidence of Comex to settle through physical delivery, this is a big problem and there is the potential that this could unravel. It's similar to fractional reserve banking, if there is a complete loss of confidence in a bank, there is a run on that bank, and without outside intervention the bank does not have the ability to make whole its depositors.