RE: Best mining exploration potential on AIM16 Apr 2026 11:07
Stonking DFS, which will only get better with the addition of the heavy rare earths as MarginMiner says. Market reaction so far has been underwhelming, which I will use as an opportunity for further top ups.
I tend to agree with Rick Rule, that valuing these long life mines on an NPV basis really misses the point. Anything beyond 15 years is so heavily discounted that it has a negligible impact on NPV. Saipan has talked about this being a 100 year mine. The NPV and IRR figures completely miss this point. At the end of the first 15 years of cashflow you get to start all over again. Our NPV and IRR also suffers from the fact that we have a phased ramp up.
If we instead look at an EBITDA multiple what do we get? Well steady state EBITDA is $476m. A typical EBITDA multiple for a large, low cost producer is over 10. But given we are in a relatively undeveloped mining jurisdiction, maybe we discount this to a 6-8 multiple to be conservative. That's a range of $2.85bn to $3.8bn. This is before we add in the heavy rare earths, before we account for cheap IDFC financing and doesn't take into account that we are going to be (imo) in a commodities super cycle over the next 5-10 years.
We are currently sitting at a market cap of $345m, which is roughly 10% of the mid point of the range I've given above. As Bonker pointed out on the Mkango board yesterday, projects with a DFS tend to be valued at circa 30% of NPV to account for execution risk. We enjoy the support of Rio, the IDFC, the Japanese government, the US government, Traxys and Mitsui, and have an extremely high quality DFS, so I would argue that 30% is on the low end for us (this project will get built!). But even by that metric, applied to my EBITDA multiple, we should be valued 200% higher than we are today, and that's before the heavy rare earths!
As for the 23% project IRR, as MarginMiner says, this will be greatly enhanced by the heavy rare earths. When we finance the project with low cost IDFC debt it will also mean an equity IRR which is substantially higher than this, I'm thinking 40-50%+. As for the comment about high capex, I don't think at $727m that it's particularly high to get to first production, particularly when we are talking about a potential 100 year mine and when we've got the backing of the IDFC, US and Japan who want / need this project to happen.
So all in all, I am extremely bullish and will increase my holding over the coming days at these prices (if they stay here). Well done Frank, Saipan and team.