Member Info for Escapetohome

Hi madchick Been a while since we heard from you here, how is your iofina holding these days? I remember you sold some around 18p with the aim of buying back a few lower down. Did this strategy all work out for you in the end? Be interesting to know as some may have followed your lead. Hee hee!

The £2000 earlier buy is mine. I bought in on Yasx recommendation. That man is rarely wrong.

Theanalyser , thanks for your comments and contribution, i think i know you from the advfn thread. Really great to have someone here from industry, telling us some insider views. I am just gambling here, i sense as you say the bad management and agree with you on that. My gamble is thAt it is in the price and we may see it rise if good news. Alternatively i will lose the lot. Any way your view has helped keep a perspective and just risk a very measured amount. Thanks.

Dictionary definition :: to gamble - take risky action in the hope of a desired result. As you admit the risk in your post below, i find it is a form of gambling. QED.

Morning rheumking - good luck with your purchase!

How are you doing madchick? Are you buying more shares at these levels?

Bears spot on with this one - calling it right time and time again. If you slip up again and again the city doesnt forgive. Nowhere near the rampers target of 25p, in fact it doesnt appear that the iodine price is even rising, something that a well known poster on the bb is going to happen for the last 3 years. The bear case has been correct with perhaps a few trading opportunities along the way for risk takers. IE TRADING SHARE NOT INVESTMENT GRADE.

Absolutely nowhere near your ramp target of 25 p , not even half that, much less than half. Whatever posseses you to make these forecasts? GREED.

I notice this dropped down again today. Anyone know whats going on here. Are the results due soon?

You guys never learn --- hawky , i dont think they can avoid it , they are addicted ever since the 'whoosh' of the share rise during the ramp phase, daily ramping and concommitant share rises --- thouroughly addicted, no less than heroin addicts. Each day their addiction punches them day after day as the price falls and falls leaving them sick. But they cannot press the sell trigger! I am unhappy that a thouroughly nice lass like madchick could get mixed up in this sordid world.

Right again Hawky! Youve never been wrong yet! No comment from madchick yet , she was very happy to have sold at 18p and apparently bought back at 8 - 12 p. Already a more than 50 percent loss from those levels. Poor chicky! What makes people so full of themselves that they dont consider the other side of the story? I expect a poster called superg can answer that question. I hope he lost a bundle on these but i suspect not as his main purpose was to ramp, and he probably sold after the ramp. He maintained a pretence of interest , talking about chile and sqm ( but nothing about iof) for a year or so, because he knew his followers ( sheep) would have lost an absolute bundle.

Happy Easter to Hawky and Dav , the Butler, Maca, and Jonnybig, Netley, and all the bears. The bulls have been anihilated. { so far}

Yes Happy Easter all bulls , and all except rampers. I expect well i know there are some who were looking forward to a nice retirement and believed in the research put out by by the clown, as they thought he was some sort of expert. Now we know he was just masquerading, and was aided in the bluff by techniques such as the hot phone to lance and the appearance sky blue financial modelling prediction of the share price. £15 - £20 by now was the prediction, with dividends. Tantamount to a fraud really. All aided by hundreds and hundreds of baaing sheep. Well done Hawky. And i note that some still have a £2.50 target. Just 5.5p to sell i believe?

Most definitely Hawky , your updates will certainly have been a very very useful steer to investors of all levels of experience, from the green unitiated right through to the competent institutional investor. The perfect counterpoint to the 'fly trap' research by the bulls , who after year after year of failure, find themselves unable to change course and rigidly stick to their guns displaying no flexibility of attitude -- a must if you are to survive in these markets. Yes , Hawky your posts have saved investors money, and i am only one such proof, but there will be many many more out there.

Another excellent update Hawky , beethoven, brahms and schubert all rolled into one -- sweet music. Youve called this spot on so far and i wonder how iof will dress the next update? Only a gambler would take a pot shot at this share and there are far better shares around to gamble on.

I would suspect the bullish post good spelling is down to just using a computer spell checker rather than any english ability. ::))

I can see why the yanks came over here to float off this crock. If they tried this on over there every man and his dog would be phoning their lawyer. And a certain poster on the other thread would have you believe it was because it is to keep iof ' under the radar, ping ' UNDER THE RADAR -----PING. Funny very very funny.

Do thousand upon thousands of posts about chile and sqm say anything new? Not even about iof. Move on deluded fellow , find peace = forget iof.

Another prescient post hawky! Cant wait for the next update! Spot on once again! DOWN AGAIN FOLKS ALL TIME LOW APPROACHES. Whilst some of the bulls seem to be having a whale of a time, i bet their bank balances arent. OUCH OUCH OUCH!!!!!! , poor madchick, aimlespunter an eek. And no more than 5 p to go before hawky's prediction is realised----- bust or so many shares issued that toilet paper status is achieved.

Aimless punter, your comment of my knowledge of english words does not worry me, i came here to make money not to learn english. The research posts by the rampers have singurlarly failed in helping me to that end, wheras i have found the posts by hawkhead and dav to be spot on, and have been consistently helpful in my arrival of an opinion not to waste more money by buying the shares of iofina. That is the question.