Member Info for Escala

This is not appropriate for valuing a company at this stage.

I suggest you look at the research of:

Liberum - 85p

Zeus - 100p

Peel Hunt - 125p

All produced within the last few days or so.

Or are you more expert than they are??

O dear o dear. Do you people make any money investing? You seem very ignorant in how to value peri commercial opportunities. Ade especially who must have a broken abacus as he comes out with 12p.

I'm going to leave it there. This board no longer has any merit and feeding you derampers and your agenda is self defeating. Bottom feeders all.

Daz you idiot...it's a ten-year DCF. Like I said you clearly do not know what that means.

Back to numbers school for you Daz.

And just to let you know, I'm winning.

Daz, firstly do you actually know what a DCF valuation is as your comment suggests you have no idea. Clue: It's nothing to do with current turnover.

Secondly a £1 valuation gives a MCap nowhere near £1Bn, just another example of the lies you spout to fit your agenda.

What a strange and nasty person you are.

Zeus has not halved the target Daz. It has produced a fully costs DCF valuation so the target is a current valuation not a future one.

But again why would you let the truth get in the way of your twisted rhetoric and agenda?

That's completely wrong. Only three analysts cover...one is Panmure at pretty much Google's apparent consensus figure. One is Zeus at 100p ,and one is PH at just below £2.

But of course you know that Daz. Just more deliberate misinformation and lies to confirm your lack on honesty and honour.

DW if you can't even be bothered to read the latest broker notes, or go to the AGM, please do not pretend you have a valid view. Perhaps leave it to those who can be bothered to keep up with the company?

Rubbish Daz. They are clearly expecting (or know that) the deals are being done right now that will result in orders anytime soon, and sales and revenue starting this October.

It is also not a case of back to the drawing board. AFC has three product lines. The PT is ready for sales (Acciona has already ordered), the S+ is quite advanced, and the cracker stuff is new and potentially game changing. The IP alone will already have a value. As you said, the brokers know exactly what AFC is doing and they say the PTs will bring in £6m revenue in the next 18 months. That's a ten fold increase in 24 over 23.

What is your agenda in putting the worst possible spin on everything AFC says and does. You clearly have one.

The AGM and webinar answered the questions Git. Perhaps you should have attended or listened better?

It was a real pleasure to see the webinar this lunch time and get a solid contemporaneous account as to where AFC is.

I get the sense of genuine commercial traction, and a lot of relationship building that will lay firm foundations for construction and EV in the near future, then data centres and finally marine. Institutional investors are coming on board, and AFC seems to be having regular conversations (which yield results) with some of the biggest players globally in multiple areas eg some of the world's biggest ship builders and the world's second largest construction company. The plant hire companies will soon be on board and discussions are on going.

I am also only just beginning to appreciate how big the NH3 cracker story might be. This could be the best cracker tech available and it will stand alone as a product (eg to re fuel hydrogen lorries) as well as supplement H2 power generators. No wonder they have set it up as a separate division. There must already be value attached to the IP and I will be very interested to see how the brokers value AFC now. Remember that before their valuations were based pretty much on EV only and were pre power tower, never mind pre cracker.

I think we might all agree that AFC had made errors in the past, but the pace of innovation and pipeline development in the last 12 months has been staggering. AFC has a very talented team, whatever you think of the CEO, and the new CFO seems a very safe pair of hands.

I do not expect some on this board (and we all know who they are) to change their tune (which is mainly for their own perverse and selfish gain), but speaking for myself I am more confident about the direction AFC is taking and that it will get there than I have ever been before.

Should anyone feel this is a ramping post, please look back at my posting history and you will see that I am anything but a serial ramper.

And how exactly do you know that Col Flashman?

This is key. Look at the cost savings compared to the Power Tower. And it is right at the size required for genset displacement.

I don't think we will see many Power Tower sales...especially as AFC is comparing it negatively to its own newer products. This is where commercialisation starts and other constructors will view this news with great interest.

This is bigger than the RNS first seems.

So you will be at the AGM Haggis??

Can anyone on here translate what Derek just posted? Google turns his gibberish into gibberish.

The buys and sells take place a very similar prices - so my bed and ISA had a buy and sell price just 0.05p apart. Both transactions were recorded as sells because both transactions took place below the mid price. That is how the buy-sell algorithms work.

To put it in simple terms, the buy part was recorded as a sell because the purchase price was below the advertised mid price. Hence the market thought it was 2 sells whereas it was actually one buy and one sell.

Simple enough for you?? I'm no moron.

Come on Ade. Even a thicket like you could work out that:
1. The volume is very low so irrelevant
2. Many will relate to bed and ISA deals which tend to be reported at the sell price as the buy element if often at a low sp

Either you have no idea, in which case people should ignore you, or you have an agenda in which case people should ignore you. Same end result.

I hope you made it home MPO818. Those Teslas are about as reliable as a politician at interview.

Thanks BumbleB

I don't claim to BumbleB, but it needs more of them!!
And you must accept that the majority on here are male.
How many women in your Telegraph group? I'm guessing the membership here is a similar profile.
What percentage of people on this board would you guess are female BumbleB?