RE: Time for action14 May 2023 23:38
Thanks F79,
The expectation of using existing warrants pretty much avoids the question. They have limited warrant cover and I assume any acquision will cost in shares.
I agree we don't have the whole story, that is a very fundamental part of the problem.
The expenditure needs to be reined in.
I'm sure you've seen the issues with companies with one abnormally large shareholder.
Funds are needed but not at the expense of giving away the company.
I am actually beginning to suspect that Ben is just the public face, rather than the driver behind these decisions.
These questions need to be responded to publicly and preferably formally, so that individual shareholders don't skew the picture.