RE: New6 Jan 2021 10:48
@smorrisjones
History
*Tomco has a number of leases with similar mineralogy.
*The previous POSP runs resulted in a very viscous material which was only saleable by leaving in some of the solvent which was used to remove the hydrocarbon from the sand, which stripped the product of profit.
*Petroteq has the know how on the process
* the product does not need to be sent to a refinery to make it a useable product, so they arent producting crude oil, they are producing fuel oil, which, from the current source is "sweet", has very low levels of sulphur
*Valkor came in to the project and formed a 50/50 JV with Tomco and upgraded the POSP (Petroteq Oil Shale Plant)
*Alhtough there was a delay due some licence not being issued in time , the upgraded POSP was started on the 4th which was confirmed in this mornings RNS, which further states that it expects the plant to produce product by the weekend.
*Quadrise fuels international QFI have a patented process called MSAR which basically mixes some clever chemicals form Nouryon, water and the viscose output with all the cutting solvent removed and makes a clean useable fuel ... which *may* be useable as a marine fuel, but is in any case useable for other industrial processes ... like fuel for cement kilns of which there are many in Utah. However, QFI have not yet landed any commercial deals, partly at least due to some unfortunate events which were totally beyond their control. Their management have a soild credible background with an oil major specilaising in their Oremulsion department, which is a similar forerunner technology.
* Previous runs samples sent to England where QFIs lab is were unsuitable for testing, which only recently came to light
* QFI's management are therefore on the naughty step, and shareholders have voted against them raising further funds through placings that exclude existing shareholders
* all parties have stated a commitment to providing suitable samples in a timely manner to QFI, so that they can come up with an optimal formulation of clever chemicals
* they will then (subject to being allowed to travel to Utah !!!!!) do a demonstration of it working. It requires MSAR module, which I dont think is there at present, but basically its modularised into shipping container sizes.
* as long as that works ... and Ive every confidence it will, then all that needs doing is to sign a commercial production agreement with Greenfield and we're in business **JASON are you listening >>> Sign a Commercial Agreement <<<
* Greenfield then plan to build a further two 5000 bopd plants (the existing posp being 500 bopd) which will take just under a year and cost US$180M ... Im not sure where the money is coming from, so there might be a bit of dilution, however the payback period is only 18 months ... so that gives you an idea of the profits that are to be made once thats paid off. ... US$120M a year income stream for the life of the resource (by greenfield, so US$60M a year to tomc