RE: Re; Quality clearout30 Dec 2020 09:38
@Pioch
No I dont think it is overvalued. First Equitys research note is a good base point to start on, however significant progress has been made since then. In fact I'm in the process of writing up something of my thoughts on this exact matter as we speak. I'll publish it on here when Ive finished ... probably this afternoon.
The main points being
undervaluation of Clogau St Davids (3% of gold value) ... why ? because its not being valued as a mine thats been worked
undervaluation of new lode ... why ? because they didnt know it existed .. now its unproven .. so 3% on that would be reasonable
Gwynfynydd ... a mine that has been worked and documented .... added to portfolio since FERN (first equity research note)
Dolgellau Gold Belt new targets ... value as cash spent on exploration
Limerick ... probably zero
Brockham ... value as comparable ... Angus bought 10% for £260k, deal done since FERN
Horse Hill ... legal challenge defeated since FERN comparable recent sale, range of NPV for different production rates
Melville Bay - no activity ... no change
Inglefield Land - no activity ... no change
Thule Black Sands - note that Bluejay'sDundas adjacent resource is getting close to take off agreement, which would make this more valuable than in FERN
Amistoq - FERN values it as a virgin resource .. however, it has been worked in the past 1915-1924 and enough is know (imo) to inferr a net present value to projected production. This is one season away from being a JORC resource.
So thats the short version of why I think its undervalued on from the FERN