Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
John1970 or whatever - what a gimp. Whether or not you actually have any comms with Fat Art, it's irrelevant so why do you feel the need to come here for everyone to thank you? Good riddance if you really have gone!!
Actually, let's be honest - apart from Tilburn, I'll happily not hear from anyone here.
Whether it's the constant negativity of LB28 or Iron hide,
The illiterate noisings of HFB
Or the boring continuality of Shaa
SHUT UP.!
Every one of you has ruined this share and this BB
F-Art is taking the pi** now. Regardless of the news, he should update the market one way or another.
I was always on his team and defended him or backed him up, but my patience is running thin.
This company has such potential but he seems to be encouraging the negativity.
He can redeem himself if the next bit of news is extremely positive but the lack of news suggests otherwise.
http://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/Cuda/UScourtMaterials.htm
Some new documents on this page regarding the recievership. Some significant dates mentioned in mid to late December.
Anyone cleverer than me able to figure them out? :)
It's on http://pipeline.wyo.gov/
Navigate through the site, operators > SWP and then it's under Sundries listed with the last 2 weeks.
It's a good site to keep an eye on some of the background goings on.
On another note, I'm not too surprised by the placing - let's hope this is the turning point in share price
I notice we now have $0.05 earnings per share as shown on page 4.
I'm a novice when it comes to some of the calculations used; so don't fully understand how the P/E ratio, EPS and share price formula works.
Is the P/E ratio determined by the EPS? As in, our P/E ratio will now be 0.3 (share price) / 0.05 (EPS) = 6
OR
are we assigned a PE ratio? I.e we now have a positive EPS so we can be assigned a PE ratio and this can help us determine correct share price? As such should we see a small share price movement to correct price?
Cheers
Can anyone decifer this? It's quite a vague request and I can't decide its a positive or negative?
"Southwestern Production Corp requests confidential status for the subject well based on it being an exploration well rather than a development well. The well was drilled at the request of BLM to identify other potential producing horizons in the Barron Flats Deep Unit in order to keep the unit from being dissolved. SWPs prior development has been in the Shannon Sand which is now part of Barron Flats Shannon Unit. There are currently no wells in close proximity to the subject well that produce out of any formations other than the Shannon. SWP requests for the information of this well to be held confidential while evaluating other potential horizons, and what a new discovery might mean for their future development plans. Additional information can be provided at the request of the Commission."