Re: Question to Keith Bush16 May 2014 12:57
Question-
Northern Petroleum-
I am a private investor invested in your company and have a question concerning your Canadian operations. Listening to Keith Bush's Canadian Operations Update video on London SouthEast
dated 12 May, Mr. Bush mentioned that the company is producing oil in 3 wells: 13-33, 14-22, and 16-19. The oil from these wells is presently being trucked, however the intention is to tie-in the oil
production to either existing infrastructure or with Apache Corp.'s operations. My question: is the tie-in procedure difficult/time consuming/weather prohibitive or is it only a decision easily implemented once made? My apologies for lack of industry expertise. Thank you.
Answer from Keith Bush-
"Your question regarding the tie-in of the Canadian wells is a good one. We are currently working up an evaluation of 3 different options regarding the production. The first is to keep trucking the well fluids, which gets very expensive over time. The second is to tie into the Apache infrastructure in the area, something that for most wells will most likely need to be done during the winter period when the ground is frozen, as this will allow the pipelines to be buried properly. The third is to put in a small facility of our own, separate the fluids there and then put the oil product straight into the Plains pipeline system that runs down to Edmonton and the market.
In reality it is likely that we will go with a combination of the 3 as production will be trucked until the wells can be tied in, and then when we have sufficient production, our own facility will potentially be the best economic solution as it may well be cheaper than paying the transportation and processing tariff through Apache.
The tie in costs to Apache are not prohibitive and we are already identifying if the 3 wells available now can be tied in during the summer rather than having to wait for the winter period."