Member Info for Eddie21

STT- Good job I was sitting down ! We actually almost agreed on something !?

I personally think that the 24/7 frantic effort is totally unbiased and unselfish with no regards for any financial gain from the Bashing of the Company!!

As one of the Bashers on the ADVFN bb actually said not that long ago “ its all From the Goodness of Their Hearts” why they are here posting in to the long hours of the night without having any financial interest in the company !!

One actually and quite openly admits being a SHORTER and wants the SP to go to ZERO.. But I actually respect that.. at least he is being HONEST !!

Eddie

Whether.. running a Full Stack platform on both sides is an advantage or a disadvantage remains to be seen . I am no expert in this but there are too many variables e.g. the nature and spread of the Campaign and desired outcome, Nature and flexibility of the dual side Software deployed and cleverness of the Engine itself ?

The argument regarding the wider vulnerability of R1 as a Full Stack to Changes MUST also mean that they will have the opportunity for a wider income stream and hence can Profit at a higher rate than the One-side Only platforms.
Just Because a few other companies either don’t want to or just CAN NOT cope with operating both sides doesn’t mean anything either way. Again, you are implying that R1 WILL have disadvantages that may well don’t even apply.

Eddie

Thanks Curly for your post that now seems to have been removed!

By the way, since I have your ear..Are you too going to confessed to your multi-IDs .? The inspector seems to be getting hot on Multi-IDs again.

DOC

You have to consider that our resident doom and gloom weaver has invested a lot of time and effort in constructing and crafting these long and repetitive statements. Each, designed to leave that little element of doubt in the readers mind without really giving any in-depth opinion or analysis. Some are designed just to deflect and confuse when he is asked direct questions and put in tight corners by other posters.

Therefore, quite naturally, he wants to extract the maximum negativity mileage out of such links and statements and he will NOT give them up so easily just yet.

The other intent behind regurgitating the same old stuff is based on the principles of Brainwashing ..If you repeat the same message enough times over and over, some people might start to believe them .

Eddie

5 x Eddies

Well there you go ! I have been well and truely busted and All my IDs have been blown. I already can hear the ISPECTOR’S footsteps approaching.

Incidentally Oilvlam you may as well come clean too and confess to your other IDs you are using as there will be no escape from the clutches of the BB inspector of IDs.

Enjoy the weekend everyone.. and that includes you STT

More likely Multi-EDs !!

____________________________

Or Multi- HEADS even !! But for god sake lets not give people any NEW ideas !! OK Oilovlam ?

Only one Eddie !

Whoops !! I signed that last post twice as Eddie! Hope I am not going to be accused of having Multi-IDs !!!

Now then… In the light of the historical Revenue/Profit/Loss list that you keep bringing up Brassneck has been and is yet again asking you a very fair and logical question!

Please answer him

Eddie

Eddie

STT

And I have been around longer than 2011 and that doesn’t make me more right or wrong either.

I too have seen those very changes since the blog that you mention !! However, I deal in the Here and Now and NOT what happened 4-5 years ago. You seem to want to forget the evolution and change that R1 has gone through during this period, turning in to in my opinion a totally different company.

Those changes and transformations were necessary and pivotal to its very existence and progress and NOW we have a larger and better equipped company that can boast being cleaner than clean in the present climate.

You may say well what about the low SP then ? Well, those changes and evolutions , as well as recent acquisitions have carried elements of RISK in the eyes of the market. From technical integration risks to pressure on cash in the bank risks to management continuity risks etc etc.

R1 now needs to demonstrate that as a NEW larger unified and streamlined entity it can start to generate sustainable profits. And to quote YOU .. the SP will take care of itself.

As a reminder its also worth noting that during the above transformations of R1 The Main Large Share holders not only didn’t run away BUT have been buying even more stock.

Perhaps they know something me and you don’t

Eddie

STT- I repeat for the last time..the question here is NOT whether there IS an impact of some sorts on the industry. OF COUSE !, all the companies have to alter/align themselves with new regulation ( GDPR)..technical practises (Ad-txt) etc etc. EVERY industry goes through such changes as it goes forward and evolves.

The REAL question here is whether these changes/challenges directly HURT R1 ??? You always try to imply and create the illusion that some how R1 will be disadvantaged badly. I don’t want to get too granular as to how you do it as most posters here would know exactly what I mean .

Time and time again different posters have advised you to have more balance in your posts so at least some credibility may eventually creep in to what you write.

We are sitting at the opposite ends of the spectrum …. I as a long term holder like to see R1 do well and progress… and YOU for reasons best left untold seem to want to see the very opposite !!

Eddie

NO- You haven’t directly said the challenges effect R1 only...you are slightly cleverer than that to do so but those of us who have come to understand and read between the lines of what you say KNOW how good you are in implying and sawing doubt via careful sentence arrangement... am I NOT right STT ?

Anyway off to dinner… have a nice evening

Eddie

I don’t think anyone here has yet seen ANY solid evidence that any revenue revision from R1 has any DIRECT connection to such claims. On the contrary, R1 seem to have been aware of such evolutionary changes in time and have been addressing them one by one.

The WHOLE industry is going through these changes and none of these changes is particular to R1. If anything I will argue that such changes will prove beneficial to R1 in the medium term as smaller and weaker suppliers are driven out of the market not able to comply.

Eddie

Our negativity weaver is starting to run out of pegs to hang his hat on.. one after the other..his arguments ( if you can call them that) such as Ad-txt, GDPR, Transparency etc. are being dissolved in solid counter information put out by R1 itself or other bodies.

This explains the shear desperation now so apparent in the utter frenzy of posts he is putting out on other threads, most of which nothing but deflections from the issues and questions he is confronted with.
Eddie

You have missed the direction and the real meaning behind Oilovlam,post. Try reading
It again!

I wonder if you get banned for accusing
People of cheating for having multiple IDs?

Beautifully put Brass

Eddie

congratulations R1

Bumbag- good post, however, I think you will find that his DOSE indeed have a financial position in R1 and it is a SHORT position. He will have NO Interest in contacting anyone in R1 either as he wouldn't like the reply he would get. what we are witnessing here is TYPICAL shorter behaviour Eddie

I too had a post removed a couple of weeks back! I always look at that as a compliment that the other poster has had to go through the trouble of running to the Admin in order to remove it. Truth hurts at times.