Member Info for DXB1

Agree with you Jace. Quite happy for work to be done in the background. It is that work that will provide value and move the SP. I’ve also been adding each month. V small amounts compared to some. But building up nicely. CIZ is actually my largest holding so I’m committed

Nitro, yesterday you guessed a push to 3p. Today a finger in the wind for 2p. I think you’re either trying to convince yourself or lure in others. I don’t share Widglides pessimism. But I do think he’s right today that we will drop back down in the absence of concrete news. That said, long term prospects are significant hence why I hold

No shorts, spot on so far. Well done

Nothing to suggest a BP takeover so probably best not to set that hard running. Takeover at some point by someone is, I think, a strong possibility. But suggesting runners and riders is premature

…. Still glowing in the dark

Article at Page 56 in the business section of The Times today about the above company (only have paper copy). Raised £14m. Expanding UK/US teams by 35. Helps doctors diagnose and treat early stages of lung cancer. Technology reads CT scans. Being tested in ten NHS hospitals to see if it can cut the need for scans and biopsies. Wondered how that sits alongside CIZ?

Received email this morning from UKNSA. They have updated recommendations around screening for lung cancer. It’s good news - on gov.uk

Fair comment

No reason not to be happy. A placing at this time was signalled from the birth of CIZ. All on schedule as far as I can see

Top contribution as always Neil. Thank you

Risky, the only poster I recall using the word ‘Pal’ is the Buoys. You one and the same? :)

Thanks Duff. Although these Research Notes after a RNS are money for old rope. All the same info as the RNS itself. I’m not worried about the SP atm. Might top up at 4p despite promising myself not to invest anymore. Would be a steal

And listed to access the funding opportunities as and when required. Although we’re funded for a while longer I guess there could be some dilution if agreements don’t start to bring in cash. Is that holding back the SP?

ChrisH, market doesn’t like the Chinese tie up

Swiss/Carl, thanks for sharing. Much appreciated

Think it was when he called at least three people liars that things got spicy! Best to just focus on the asset and the great opportunity before us. Think this SP will be history come the Sumner. Great board working on our behalf with great communication

Grappa, steady there. I predicted a retrace to 9.5 on about 18 Jan and got pulled up by our resident BB police - you know their names. I feel more confident about how funds might be raised in a non dilutive way with this recent appt so a good development.

Apologies for this. But it is important to know where posters are coming from. Thebhoys effectively slandered me earlier by calling me a liar. Interesting to note that just yesterday she/he did exactly the same thing on the BPC board against a poster there saying 'TRP-BPC why do you keep knocking the SP you ain’t invested here and never have been. If you were you said that you’d sold up and we’re going. Your just a compulsive liar.' There is no need for such abuse. I will report this behaviour. And take action against Thebhoys is she/her repeats the slander. I will now retire from this board. GLA. Meanwhile, don't tolerate abuse/bullies

Careful what you post Thebhoys, a) this is an open forum and I am entitled to my opinion b) I am indeed invested in BPC and have been for almost ten ears. My holding has repeatedly been diluted so I have experience of that in this sector c) do tell me what percentage of my posts there have been negative - 1/2%? d) at best you are blind to the need for more funds which may (may) come from dilution. ZEPH has said that funds will be required so what's the bad thing aout flagging it may come from dilution? e) I had an average of double digits from Rose days but averaged down first thing Monday so have benefited from this week's rise. I am invested f) Thanks for confirming you filtered me. That makes two that I know on this board simply because you are both closed to an alternative view and g) by all means if you don't ike the truth. But don't call me a liar again without proof. Can yu prove there will be no more dilution? I can't. Can you?

Sorry to contradict. There are funding uncertainties. Funds are certainly required. But we don’t know how they will be raised. That is a classic uncertainty so please don’t argue otherwise. I’m invested with eyes open. But there is a risk of dilution. It’s a fact unless you can say it’s not as the BoD has decided x y and a. Good to be optimistic. After all it’s why we are here. But let’s keep it factual