Member Info for Dustyslay

Hold Fire, i don't know if you know what a "Short Seller Report" is, but im currently reading the 8 k filings, US version of a RNS. I see they issued warrants, $11.50 and considering where its Sat that seems implausible, can be a Red herring at times. Drops below $1, does a stock split and the its not Extended to warrants so need to assess that. Certainly the Short Seller Report is always damaging hack job.

A short-seller report is an investigative document published by an activist investor that details negative allegations about a public company to drive down its stock price. The goal is to profit from a drop in the company's stock by having already placed a "short" bet, which means the short seller profits if the stock price falls. These reports often allege financial trouble, fraud, overvaluation, or accounting issues, and the claims are spread through media and social media to amplify their impact.

What it is: A report, also called a short-seller attack, is a research report containing negative allegations about a public company.

Purpose: The short seller's objective is to cause the company's stock price to fall so they can profit from their short position.

How it works:

The short seller first takes a short position, which means they borrow shares of a company and sell them, hoping to buy them back later at a lower price.

They then publish a report detailing allegations against the company, such as financial misconduct or accounting problems.

The report is often accompanied by a campaign across social and traditional media to spread the allegations and create a negative sentiment around the company.

If the stock price drops as a result of the report, the short seller buys back the shares at the lower price to return them to the lender, pocketing the difference as profit.

Impact on the company: The publication of these reports can significantly damage a company's reputation and stock price.

I recommended it, because it highlights both the importance but also the massive challenges pitfield faces against a strong China Dominated market, you see Doc its not just about having the stuff. Others do too, but struggle to compete. Will Western leaders follow on Rhethoric without a Trump office? Will Tarriffs remain forever through strong opposition both internationally and Domestic, both in opposition and public sway. Most hear likely think its bad, its a polarised subject. For me its black and white, voted on, mandated so deal with it. But what's certain is EEE won't be able to go it alone, so someone will need to be willing to take on the Challenge. My minds always wandered Saudi, they have the Desire to upsurp China and move from Oil to critical materials and western Supply lines. I don't see anyone stepping up, certainly not the Aussies they just let the highest bidder take from the Land. But I think if this is to be done, the dominance broken, and they somehow wrestle the market from them id imagine Pitfield will be an integral part of it.

So it's a case of IF? Or can they, and who will

Trevor

I agree with you and you know this, but what do you consider i do about it? I come here Monday to friday to potentially discuss the days topic, debate direction Short term or this morning about the presence of a Sophisticated trader bringing down the stock, which can remain amicable and insuly free until this:

RE: Rules of the gameToday 08:34

>>>> Im not Denying

No, no and no, the BAASTard says, unless is ME, ME and ME, everything else is WRONG say the rubber doll partner

Every day, all day, all week. And directed at not just me, or anyone who dares challenge or enter into any dialogue

Just think it was a Poorly Educated response.

But he is also Monsa, so by reflection I was not surprised

Eachtotheirown

When i used to post here, he used to mock the investment on dips that i was down, the stock was awful and do his usual petulant bashing and PMSL sign off. Ironic he bought it himself and has ended up under on it really. Funny how things pan out, for this amazing investor.

As for here, well I dont participate because im looking to Exit. I have had plenty of trades since I decided to leave forum, I put a percentage here. 100 here, 70, 150 etc all the low at no cost to a static SP so now sat at 0.72 I will wait, obviously holding my capital but im not in need of it so a rise hits my Sell set price ive planned a Exit within the realms of possibility or one day will have to accept the original loss but recover all further transactions without loss at the price if it remains here. I said id give it to end of year back in March, ill extend it to February

Looks like you have completely dessimated the HUI forum, with your incessant negative vibes.

Trust you to Empty the Room Fray Bento

Used to be a Busy Forum this

Only Red Hornet can clear a Room like this

The "Fray Bentos" man himself

Only you

Could buy EEE, and be at a loss

That also speaks Volumes, and with that a chapter was closed

A new Forum low that

Not worth responding, condolences to anyone who that may have upset or caused harm

Well the wide majority only use 1 account, so its fair you should do the same. Its all anyone asks

Under his Skin 🤣

He really does live in a Dream world, then wakes up in the Tent ⛺️

So Cripsy post goes, I suppose I mentioned "He who shall not be Named" again and the feed mysteriously vanishes.

Well crispy, ive sent a follow up Email, in relation to Monsa

Who will be to Blame when you are Banned?

DUSTY

Ok Doc, accepted. Below the Belt, i apologise.

Its an unnecessary reply, but to say your agenda towards me is not illicit in these responses is denial on your part.

All you ever do is throw shade, try get me removed and be a jerk. So practice what you preach, in terms of at times you have yourself to blame.

I never had anything against you till recent

Doc,

You are the type of Recommends these.

"Dusty, is a sick individual, and only the Grandma knows it.

Talking the P!!ss or true? She is sharing the one-bedroom flat with him , so he is sleeping in the sofa, as soon as she gets up for the toilet early morning, he has to get up to start posting"

When i get rid of Monsa, you will be next

You should really attach names to these passive comments

SETS vs. Market Makers

SETS (Stock Exchange Electronic Trading Service): This is an electronic order book for the most liquid stocks, such as those in the FTSE 100. On SETS, buyer and seller orders are matched directly with each other by the system based on price and time priority. This process bypasses the traditional market maker model, leading to tighter bid-ask spreads.

Market Makers (MMs): In older, "quote-driven" systems like SEAQ or hybrid systems like SETSqx, market makers provide liquidity by holding an inventory of shares and continuously quoting both a buy (bid) and a sell (ask) price. They profit from the spread between these prices.

Do Market Makers "Sell Shares When Moving to SETS"?

No. When a stock moves to be traded on SETS, the trading method changes:

Change in Role, Not a Forced Sale: Market makers' primary role as mandatory liquidity providers in a quote-driven environment is eliminated on the SETS order book. They don't suddenly "sell all their shares" in a single event.

Optional Participation: Market makers can still participate in the SETS market, but they do so as regular traders, placing limit orders on the order book like any other participant, rather than being obliged to provide continuous two-way quotes in a specific size.

Inventory Management: The market makers will manage their existing inventory through normal trading operations on the new system or other venues to balance their books, as they always do. Their strategies will shift to reflect the new, order-driven environment, but it's not a singular, forced "sell-off" related to the move itself.

In short, the transition to SETS fundamentally alters the structure of the market for that specific stock, reducing or eliminating the reliance on traditional market makers for liquidity provision.

Maybe learn how to string a few sentences together first, be helpful to all Napthman

I was mistaken, you are not as uneducated as it appears. The ingenuity behind the new excuses is impressive.

But still

Why CONFIRM a reversal to win a petty battle? Thats not bright

Eachtotheirown

Its like playing Cluedo with a 5yr old

Of course he reads the posts, he loves the Negative drama. He needs to see what's said

Good luck to him, i moved on from his negative world time ago