Member Info for dunderhead

Absolutely john but respectfully you'd have thought itceoukd have been fair comment that this was well and truly on their radar post COHO "experience" and someone may have asked (if originally not already risk assessed for Casca) had it been done so for those assets as well, back then, prior to even arriving at the corner or the rear view mirrors or whatever?! IMHO.

Hopefully SM, however a great short post 40255 on ADV from a "Slovenian gardener" (I "believe") which encapsulates most of the investor community concerns, I'd think? IMHO.

Best of luck all.

HLM I agree actually I took confidence from those figures but again could have just been a very good month.

It is simple we need good c4 &5 revenues comkng in.

We can bag all the other more complimacated stuff later but my concerns re balls and juggling remain as an earlier poster.

They certainly haven't covered themselves in glory with a simple OS facility so far, All IMHO.

SM I dont disagree but I do like to keep a tab on (estimated) cost savings and previous profit forecasts.

A lot of people on Discord were stating 1 -1.5 mm per month CB profits priir to acquisition plus I'll take 9 mm savings identified a year, so far.

So I assume we are talking estimated profits per year "as is" for CB circa 24 mm per year, prior to any uplifts from additional gas revenue and pricing?

Just so I can have a number to refer back to for later?

Anyone got any protests on these figures?

Only Q2 "messy"?!

Let's see how they do with a pump at C-3 before we get too excited about other "enhancement" projects?

Was it 250-300 bbls per day originally forecast?

But hey ho, $12 mm yearly savings already predicted at CB, does that take us up to about $24 mm a year (CB) "profit" now, before, any workovers or further production?

What a nice story, if all possible, I cannae wait!!

Chiggers so to be clear you are forecasting at least $12mm usd a year "already" at CB?

I know Shell quite well and whilst they could be "extravagant" in certain areas, I'd be f'ing livid if cost reductions, as seemingly simple as that, could be so easily identified?

It'll be interesting to see if they last as long as the wall of cash didn't.

Poor old super spurt, getting confused again about the most basic of concepts.

So to be very clear you think it is a perfectly acceptable reason / justification that PB does not give Q&A's today because he has sent an e mail to Discord. Simple yes/no, lol!!

The point still stands. I know quite a few people who dont bother with Discord for whatever reasons. Hence, an e mail to them absolutely does not excuse no Q&A's during this pivotal self created crap moment in time. IMHO.

I'd definitely prefer q&a to read against his responses to Discord. I'll be clear, as I think a complete waste of time and I don't watch them but still a good reference point for historic verbal responses when G is under "pressure"? You can't have a closed group on Discord (example GGG being banned) and then that submission of q&as on there being given as justification for no q&as on this OPEN public invitation.

But hey ho that's confirmation bias for you! All IMHO.

Mate ggg I agree 100%. I posted up on Discord you shouldn't be banned for a week or whatever but you know, you write nasty words and hurt people's feelings , lol.

This is the o&g industry for c's sake not a bloody children's nursery. Still people seem to genuinely believe posters on here, ADV or Discord "influence" the share price more than BoD performance or now the latest excuse is, that it's all in line with other market sentiment and pfmce?!

I shake my head in absolute disbelief.

Best of luck all.

It's finally clicked Stas, perhaps had you or others took notice of certain posters misgivings historically. rather than criticise them, you might not be as "angry" as you appear now? IMHO.

Best of luck all.

Whilst we are discussing such things you could also read Auto da Fe by Elias Canetti which hopefully is not analogous to the relationship ship between Discord and Gonzo?!

Johnoooooo "mate" look at my message to GGG about three or four posts ago, (from me!!).

Again zero honours for consistency!!

Right im just having a late workout then out and about.

Have a nice we all.

Superspurt and your points being.....

Sirmark. I may have been mistaken (it has happened once I think?!) but I thought it was the chap who was "commenting" (not boasting of course) about having a first class honours degree in chem. eng. IMHO!!

Ah there's my nemesis, mate ffs be consistent, I post a couple of times a month normally and am just replying now to superspurts "observations"!!

I admit I don't waste my time on here anymore but got to agree 1000% with you GGG, lol.

By the way you've got to laugh when the 1st class honours chap (so what, pretty "normal" in o&g?!) kept on picking on you because the share price wasn't "in the teens" and that seemed to "prove" you were an idiot?! One may reflect on the irony of such statements now, Lol.

Best of luck all and as ever IMHO.

Guys - just my opinion and you know my opinions on "management" here - but - I also think you need to tone down some of the comments a little on here - I have no idea what is and isn't libellous - but if some of the assumptions conclusions on here are NOT correct - in conflict with my normal views on these boards - which is no-one really takes much notice of what is posted on them (LOL!) - considering the incredibly weak share price currently - then they "could" contribute to further weakening share prices creating further issues. This is getting serious - hence by all means collate your information and seek legal advice but please don't give "management" any reason to be taken away, from being 100% dedicated to getting this "funding" situation sorted as soon as possible and spending TXP money defending themselves. As I say just my opinion and for once in my life am interested in others views on this? I know people are really p***ed off but let's keep everything caveated to being in their opinion etc. I understand there is culpability here - and people have their opinions but as mentioned a lot below - let's see what is being RNS'd etc. in the next few days - as this mess can't keep on surely? I am happy to discuss anything but perhaps some of the comments are best kept private until legal opinion has been sought? I lost a fair few quid over on IOG and a lot were very angry but really some of the "legalistic" comments were absolutely mad. That is not to say I do not see some sense in what has been posted here (but am absolutely not certain if as represented they are are correct or have any legal bearing as not an expert in this filed of law) - but these postings are just opinions and should be highlighted as such!! GGG - when you get to Discord why don't you at least ask JBL to put these questions to TXP and give them a chance to answer them - Ahem all IMHO, DYOR!!

Stas equally though you (and others) can put up your economic positive spin constantly but there is no recognition of the fact that to date this has not been matched by management performance. As posted by me before, why is it ok for you guys to post up positivity continually yet chastise others who do the exactly the same but with polarised viewpoint?

To repeat, again and again (!!) regardless of negativity on here, if Gonzo starts to produce anywhere near all the beautiful stuff that comes out if his mouth then the share price will rise.

It's really only that, that will produce those results. It's that "simple"!IMHO.

Johno of course I do ffs but lets be clear 300 bbls per day aint a great pay back for the well but I'd very very happy for this, as hopefully it is indicative of a potential substantial play rather than a pool. Whatever happened to the (now, lol) legendary Rosyton well with great initial results, if you were here long enough you'll clearly remember my cynicism long before everyone saw this.

Genuinely, after good consistent oil production proven, of course, we've still got the original gas horizon to test after that. All unproven but as I say a good marker to see that they understand the sub surface with the extra timing and determination of type of pump as indicated verbally, I believe? I truly do hope it comes in as planned. We all want to make money here don't we?

And good we've got a clear marker of pump induced 300 bbl per day, as in Gonzos words, they've had a long time studying the subsurface, so looking forward to a consistent long term 300 bbl per day profile.

Stas I hope you're not replying to my playful response to Smash'ed in your response about AIM investments?

RE i3e as you keep on referring on about it.

The management there are much higher calibre than at TXP in the first place (IMHO) but their initial foray in N Sea was a total disaster and I did caution a few mates who asked if was investing, I felt the original 2p (??!!) estimates were complete pie in the sky.

After that debacle and covid the share price was decimated and remained so until their very good well timed acquisition in Canada, which I piggy backed on to, you must have seen me posting on LSE (?!) where I did make quite few quid but, to be clear that is a very different proposition then TXP, who rather than get one (high risk) asset gamble obviously wrong they did not have a "continual performance on nearly every aspect of the business" "issue" that they touched? They just made a good acquisition and we all made a few quid.

Yes I tend to agree that if the relatively "higher than initially thought Casca gamble" succeeds this will likely be very profitable for buyers at this price but, it is still risky IMHO and the comparison to i3e isnt really that relevant? Again as ever all IMHO. DYOR!