Member Info for dunderhead

They are "cheap" for multiple reasons.

Everything TXP has "built" is on excessive debt. IMHO.

AW see my post on ADV re Gonzoisnm, can kicking and craptalk.

I've been saying for all time Casca is what is important at the moment especially Cas 3, why don't we have monthly production profiles?!

We are NOT big oil as the figures have obviously proven (yet again!). IMHO.

When, if, we ever get near to that "definition" then, I'm happy for such a level of reporting.

Oh ok I apologise. I have a couple of very very talented friends who are / were very dyslexic but actually they "conquered" that condition most of the time except for stressful times so I can understand why you must be stressed. It is very very rare for the TXP share price to go up 2 days in a row!!

So yes we can "enjoy" together!!

Oh that posted sooner than I expected?!

To continue SS, so yes, I will enjoy thank you, as I hope you do too!

Mate ffs I'm sorry to appear condescending but grammar check will you?! Your grammar appears to detiorate in direct response / relation to share price fluctuations or other similar drama?

Are you implying the recent share price action is "amazing" or something? I really didn't understand your point, as we are at what (?), 4-5 year lows, so there are likely to be exaggerated moves both ways, especially as the investor profile changes in response to this as well?!

But as earlier today, I'll happily take any moves up as I feel I am owed a lot for the incredible patience I and other long termers have shown with muppet central?!

What are you talking about SS?

Agree totally re any share price increases, I'll take em.

However if it is a sniff of postive news "leaking" then bloody RNS it.

We are where we are share price wise because of previous "perceived" (nod to the ultra experienced worldy wise "sage" SS lol) management incompetence and "worries" about this continuing.

Hence RNS the situation when anything "bad" occurs and conversely when anything "good" happens!!

We are not bloody Exxon, we are mostly retail "high risk, high return" shareholder profile, so, give the "crowd" what they want, not "big oil" RNS reporting!! Casca is our most important asset so treat it's information as such!! IMHO.

Jesus I went out to lunch and thought world war 3 had started, judging by number of posts on here.

God only knows what's going to happen if the much famed 50% in a day occurs, (now upgraded to potential 100%, I read earlier) lol.

ss i didn't blame the latest rig issue on muppet central.

i said it was the "icing on the cake".

had the bod been better at delivery to date and not made so many amateur f ups (non t&t related, which i actually find quite patronising and ******, seriously. i hate this "concept" of wokery, taking pride at localising everything but then side blaming this for short comings in delivery), then perhaps the shareholder base would be more forgiving?!

i do very much agree with stas post below regarding pivotal point in txp history, as i actually also recognised on discord earlier today on action group post, however doesn't mean the bod should be disproportionately rewarded with regard to potential ltips etc as other things could certainly have been done better!!

all imho, dyor.

No it wasn't SS?!

I'm not that old.

Lol SS mate how do you know I don't know Trinidad at all?

Perhaps I just dont mention the (albeit) brief professional experience I had there?

Let me be very clear there are far far more difficult and stressful places to work so don't start that (yawn double yawn) red herring again!

Ah SS so all the other PB (AND BoD) balls ups count for nothing?! The share price has been dead in the pan for ages and this last one is just the "icing on the cake".

However I do get it, that it is the "fault" of share commentators, like many on here, who are the real reason why the share price is in the toilet and nothing to do with the years of incompetence leading up to now, that final final final err corner for the share price to turn!! Hopefully all "this" will be in the rear view mirror at last.

Have we been "here" before?!

Each time the share price gets lower and we will soon be negative!

As ever all IMHO of course.

Actually I'm taking that.

I want to know if this was a unilateral SS award or was voted in a democratic way?

People can tick up post if they think I should be "donk" of the month.

All IMHO, DYOR!!

I actually wanted to be donk of the month.

Was there a vote or did SS just "decide" this?

What is a donk, is it like a gonk?

I think the problem is there are people here who either have investment banking and or an E&P background and they find it quite frustrating to see that almost everything TXP "management" touch, they dont seem to do it with the level of expertise or competence that they are used to seeing?

Then there are a lot of retail here that seem to think a lot of such under performance is acceptable because it's "e&p" or because it's "t&t" or both combined!!

I'd say the best indicator (not always correct of course) is the lack of II's on the share register but that's because of a couple of "de rampers" on free bb discussing such things I suppose?

Another favourite is it's the mms holding back the share price for their pals in the city?!

Nothing at all to do with the directors historically under performing to their OWN schedules and peer group of course!!

As ever all IMHO!!

I think what he (ALLI) is saying asking in the capex decision made to allocate those "constrained" funds the right questions (or any question, lol) were being asked, as to the determination of immediate requirements for said capex (materiality) and pay back rates at that time?!

We do seem to be waiting an awful long time to get to this to work, anywhere near to capacity, so at this juncture that is a fair question, is it not? IMHO.

It's a bit like the "amazing" bridge. Surely, oh surely such questions were asked (and subsequently planned for, lol) in the risk assessed (security and transportation weighted allocation) at time of rig decision, so the need and timing for bridge was already a long known known?!

Again all IMHO!!

I think so stas but if I were an II reviewing this, I'd have had following concerns.

1. Taken a long time to get "here".

2. A lot of money wasted on exploration phasing that could have been negotiated to delay.

3. More in debt than needs to be, due to above plus inefficient IS infrastructure scheduling. When will it get finally get "filled", lol?!

4. Money wasted chasing "tax losses" (I assume?)

5. Indications along this journey, of a "management" team that are hopefully learning by all their (many?) strategic and operational mistakes along the way and hopefully this is the case but time will tell?

All IMHO.

"Silent" assassin?

Apart from boring me to death with wokism and white entitlement attitude and, judging by performance to date, I have a feeling he (and the rest of BoD) would be of the Anthony Babington "school of assassin's" success!!

Just a (conspiracy related for that "excuses club") joke before anyone criticises me for "de-ramping"!! IMHO.

All very very boring for you SS but do you really genuinely think this BoD have served the "owners" of this company well?!

I think it's in minus actually and will take time to recover if ever, IMHO?

Anyone wonder why we dont have II presence when such "compelling smish smashing" value and all problems are in the rear view window or something like that anyway.

Coats please!