How about this.
..."50p by next Friday and I wouldn't want to be out of this at the week end!"...
Now if enough posters just c&p this and post it multiple times, following the logic of some posters on here, the share price will get better!
Ah lol that shouls have said sorry to Labour point.
You're not a Labour nut are you gibbers?
Therefore part of message should have said I think you're being way too generous !!
Bloody auto (in)correct!
Gibbers wtf?
You talk about years of under performance and then say our 'leader' (I seriously am not sure who your referring to there but I think hugh?) should sack them if they don't perform quickly.
What about our 'leaders' continual under performance?!
By the way (to all) it is simply ridiculous to blame a few free bb posters for the supposedly low share price of eog. From my perspective it is a big warning sign when you see those 'kind of' posts!!
All imho of course.
This is the point Lol!!
It is a £10mm not cap company that at this juncture is totally beholden to another significantly bigger o&g company farming in.
This is business, do you think the bigger o&g company is going to give a more generous deal because they are 'friendly' with eog Lol?!
They will wait and wait until eog are squirming (or at least should do) especially looking at the commercial success this current mgt have achieved?!
I'll say no more except all imho and best of luck all.
I may join you in future but still hasn't hit my desired ask price.
Yes for sure I would not want to play any silly attempted deferment games and sour any of the brilliant goodwill we appear to have with bp!! Nktb I'm assuming that's post handover, R3, Columbus decision and Row?
I'd 100% agree and perhaps be a little disappointed if not a 'little' higher!!
Why it makes no difference at all? I look at this simply from a risk analysis perspective not a pr perspective regarding the 'quality' of deal?
Timing is so close it is irrelevant!
As I say, if I were sqz I'd like the opportunity to operate the well as it will be relatively simple one and then sqz can add that straight away to their (operated) n sea cv? Of course following that strategy, they are taking on a risk (which considering how busy they are with other transition aspects) they may wish to defer?
Aligned with that bp would likely have specific rig experience (assuming isn't the first well in the rig programme) and designed the well etc. so more familiarity with the specific asset and geology?
Cumbria where do you get the months from? That 'seems' quite a long time. Can you refer me to where this has been stated in writing it waxvthis in conversation with tcw?
Also why is rhum 3 result going to make any difference to when the deal is completed? From 'my' perspective wouldn't it be better if sqz completed earlier, then 'operated' a highly successful and production accretive well?
Just my opinion and not trying to be arsey.
Anyone else have an opinion on this?
I doubt it Steve. Was it very windy out there? Whilst not exactly what I'd like to be doing I think it was just very cold out there and once ice etc removed probably not dangerous to life?! Perhaps visibility would be impacted but again not sure how much that would have impacted progress?
I think a lot of oil producers have been negatively impacted this week and sqz dragged into this?
Imho.
I see it as Erskine, Columbus, sign off of sgreement, rhum 3, Row?
Plus useful ops updates throughout the year which should hopefully provide upticjs in share price!!
Here's hoping anyways!!
Not 'hanging on' mate. I'm very happy to wait for quite a few milestones to crystallise and see the impact on the share price. Am not buying further yet as don't have the cash available!! I do want another 150k though and am very happy to pay up to 84p if the cash did become available lol!