Member Info for Dulwichman

oopsi the satisfaction requirement One for Mr Mole to comment on. Surprised he has not surfaced

toatie, May just be the American style of court work, it is very aggressive compared to the UK, Doesn't really matter as the judge is quite firm in rulings and is very quick of the mark despite the friendly face (so far) She does seem to have already got a picture in her head

Coggs Sorry must be this crap bottle of port I been looking for a good book on AIM investing, any ideas?

All seems a long time ago Yes i do remember the guess work on the pipe now

Break for lunch back at 1400 hrs their time

Perhaps fully understandable but no mention of BP in the cooperative document, also first I have heard of laying a small pipe line providing gas to the local population presumably this produced some income?

American president type person - Anyway what's in a name ha ha

A women's prerogative"

Phil, may things will change under Binden, remember that trump was seen at least as luvvie duvvie with Putin

Jeerimia99
As ever things change in the geo politcle world. Binden suspending the work in Alaska and a warning to him that Uncle Sam is too reliant on imported oil mainly but some gas. The march of china ant the Bear (perhaps by proxy - Turkey? The EU and us being too reliant on The Bears gas , Binden back off over Noredstreamii an increasing price of oil and gas lack of exploration for replacement by the big boys and other things all come into the picture There will be small amount of pressure for those invested in the big gas interconnector which we were told by ZeeM that we would have access too but given the present state of affairs is he believable? even so that does have huge spare capacity and they will want it filled so yes I do think that from what we have worked out we do have some importance in terms of strategic gaols still as long as the asset is as big as we have been told and can be got out of the ground at a good price. As to the CIA etc it is possible such operatisations do take place even Britannia plays this game but we are unlikely to find out especially as we know the level of politicly lobbying which seems over and above. My only concrete comment is that we do seem to keep getting out of some odd scrapes over the years , you could put that down to luck or?

TSB1
I am not sure I am allowed to call him him by what I would like to ( I certainly would face to face AND take the consequences especially as I have partaken of wine and looked him the face) ZEE.M does sound rather pathetic? ZM sounds polite!!!!

We just may need to tone things down a bit despite yet even more useful and extraordinary information coming to light and many thanks to looed on this.
Firstly with regard to the Court case. Please remember that we are only hearing one side of the argument at the moment and of coarse this will only be judged on the evidence presented. As have been pointed out these letters have not been presented in evidence to the court.
Secondly we have no idea what rabbits may come out of the bag ( on either side but mainly ZeeMs) although from what I have seen I am cautiously optimistic at this stage.
Thirdly even if we do win there is a hell of a lot back filling to do to get the show back on the road. Given what we know outside the Court case and our suspicions I do believe the show could be put back on the road but there would be many hurdles. Only saying but at least we are still alive and have have a chance

sorry - fat finger - admissible

Key point made by the judge is that these full financial statements with notes may or may not be admirable. I did get a feeling that that ZEEM's people are on a fishing trip. Difficult to tell from the judge as she is very relaxed in her commentary "it may be important in who ever appeals my decision" lax language for a judge or is she suggesting she thinks this is above her pay grade.

Were on!

Have we got time and or date wrong?

https://video.ibm.com/channel/sSquTrGTjBg

Well something not quite right. 30 ish mins late by the judge I would suggest is about max.

The judge is sitting 5 days a week with jury cases I seem to remember. I expect there has been an over run

Free
This is I believe quite an important point. To me as a lay person the Judge clearly wants to have a full a picture as possible within the scope of the case especially as there were so many objections which she over ruled ( but not all from memory), Given the time for discovery both in this case and others, these late offering of evidence (much to the annoyance of Zee ms side)is I suspect a tactile move . Completely backs up Oopsi's point of view that this is all about the documents. Bottom feeding I expect from Oopsi but to us lay people helps in following the case. To think that I am giving up a Tuesday evening to follow a Court case (well at least a glass or two in my hand as compensation) is a really sad state of affairs for us all. It should never have got this far and we still do not really know for what. Is SM, and Zee ms personal reputations or is it a chance that it is the beginning of getting us back on track?