Member Info for dsmith57

No probs, Lens. Thanks for all your efforts and expertise here.

Thanks, Paddy. I tried, unsuccessfully to get just this explanation from the board. As usual you are the epitome of clarity. I was concerned that the "good stuff" had all been used up in this rather modest MRE but, given we have such a large area and further depths still to compute, I am a bit more content that all is more than well.

I'll give up for now. No doubt everyone will be happy about that.

Can anyone help? On the flat, plan view, how much of the areas delineated are covered in this MRE? It seems that no one knows. If it is the whole of the bottom part of the ovoid shape I reckon that we are in a bit of trouble since that is the area with the thickest, by far, area of high grade. I know we are open at depth etc. etc. but I am concerned by the level of the MRE if all this area has been taken into account in inferring the amount.

Thanks, Lens. Can't visualise this in 3d. In the 2 d pics above In pages 8 and 9, how much is covered? Thanks.

If the MRE includes the whole of the bottom breccia and high grade and that only amounts to 4.2 m ounces then there is considerably less gold than I thought.

Sorry, can't see any black dotted Ines. Can see red ones. If that is right then a rather bigger are than I thought will have been included in the MRE and that includes the largest and thickest area of high grade. Concerning.

Not clear to me exactly the area used for the MR Is it the whole of the bottom of the ovoid or just a small, easternmost portion. Thanks in advance.

This has now become a total joke. The company's contact with its shareholders is a disgrace. Does anyone actually know what stages these supposedly magnificent tests are at? Looks like good old AIM yet again.

Any idea what time guys?

We are now at a fascinating stage of the company's development. It has really surprised me that more institutions and funds have not taken more of an interest in Greatland. It is probably because of their inherent conservatism in owning what they perceive as speculative stocks. In my view that conservatism is on the cusp of changing. BlackRock have recently bought a chunk as we know and as our market cap rises and we are consistently de-risking our asset with every corporate move, superbly orchestrated by the Board and with each Newcrest report, it seems inevitable that other Funds will follow. When they do, and if we get good news from Scallywag, it is simply incomprehensible where the share price might end up. Anyone even thinking about selling at this level needs serious medical intervention! Good luck all!

Good or bad? Well we have given rather a lot away but my view is that we cannot evaluate properly until we know about SWAG. If that has hit big and we can hold on to a good percentage of that then in my view the deal is a great one. We can batter on with Scally while simultaneously getting the exploration of our other districts done for free. Remember everyone, we have no income as of now. How many Aim tiddlers have decent assets and no cash to develop them. We can all name more than a few. They dilute repeatedly to keep the lights on and go nowhere. We will be all guns blazing on three fronts. If Scally fails though, it may not be quite as good a deal as we thought. Given the way this is panning out however I feel very confident.

Let's face it, trust in Smith is now totally shot. As others have said, does anyone actually know what the hell is going on and what the timelines really are? Validation, clinical validation, batch production, we have been tied up in knots andI for one do not have a clue where we are at. What was the purpose of today's RNS? As soon as I read it my heart sank. The price was only going one way today. This company can only now be seen as dodgy as feck; the Kamanis' in at 18p when the price was over £1, the £48 million raise when we were fully funded, the infamous house purchase and now after every other company said that a saliva test was not on, a capitulation on that, too. Who knows whether we will ever get a test? If we do it will be very late in the cycle and we risk losing out wholesale. Smith's tactics have been shocking. I thought that this was different from the usual AIM rubbish. I was wrong!

Enough said in the header really. Saliva failed, let's face it. Bell said as much. Deceived by the Board. Nice few quid for Al and we are no nearer a test than we were months ago. Disgusted.

Pound cake is absolutely right. Alistair's tactics have cost us a lot of money. The pursuit of perfection has delayed us perhaps fatally.

Sadly, at 17m 30s into the interview Bell speaks disparagingly about saliva tests saying that they have had "trouble getting them to work very well" Not good.

Don't encourage this narcissist. Nobody cares how many shares you have Spy. You have embarrassed yourself on this board today. Take a rest.

"LFD evaluations complete" Sounds like a major step forward. The waiting here has become totally excruciating, particularly for those investors who like me, shifted over here from Novacyt at the wrong time. Now, at last, there may be light at the end of the tunnel. GLA.

Am I the only one who is genuinely perplexed about how these tests which are thought to be inferior to Avacta's are able to be sold now. Have they struggled through the gluepot system which is Condor? I don't think they have. So why are they authorised and validated? This is now seriously beyond a joke. Hitching ourselves to this joke of a government is beginning to look like a huge tactical mistake.

Total joke, Spy. Narcissistic nonsense.