RE: Share price22 Dec 2020 12:41
posted?
"Imagine a world where when somebody posts there's "been no commercial sales", "no interest" because "Blockchain's too expensive", one could instantly test its accuracy."
I have never posted "been no commercial sales". If you read my post I said "Still no paying customers for CovID" which is 100% true.
I guess you're right. I can't say for certain that there has been no interest. Maybe someone enquired about CovID and then decided against buying it. I can say that no-one has bought the product though.
The third 'Quote' "Blockchain's too expensive" is another figment of your imagination. I never said that either. Here's what I said
"Blockchain is expensive. That would be my guess to the main reason as to why no-one wants CovID."
I'm not sure what your first paragraph is about
"The most opportune time to highlight the core proposition of Blockchain - it records, in the most secure manner possible, the immutable truth so that all stakeholders can record, trust and transact data and value"
That's not true. It's not the most secure manner possible. Until a blockchain is running at a certain scale, it's actually easier to compromise than a more traditional model.
So, I made one statement, about there being no interest, that I can't verify. The rest is, as you put it. The Immutable truth.
If you want to look at people posting lies. Maybe you want to look below at some statements you've made recently.
"Newcastle Health has bought COV-ID and Guy describes the value in building credibility. An insurance industry company is also using it." Lies. No-one has bought Cov-ID. NPH are trialing Onsite-ID. Not CovID
"but almost every single top rank business is quietly investing into Blockchain". Got any proof of that. I work in tech for a company worth over 5bn. We looked at blockchain and decided it's too costly. It's also slower than traditional infrastructure. It can't do as many transactions per second. I'm sure, being a blockchain expert, you already knew that though.