Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
Thank you Whispering,
that is the most coherent; logical and consistent, argument that you have yet posted.
That's appreciated.
And yes my apparent 'beef' is that you now daily take centre-stage with these illogical comments, whilst the rest of the shareholders are unanimously in support of trying to seek the truth of what is going on, by any means and without glibly resorting to "soz, it's all NDA".
And so who recently quoted…
‘play the ball and not the player’ ???
Its perfectly acceptable if you are not then able to clarify or justify any of your arguments.
Difficult times for all LTH. Some though try to seek a resolution.
“.. I doubt the SFO would be too concerned re my ‘illogical opinions’..”
Why on earth would the SFO consider your opinions ???
Again, this is totally illogical.
“..nor be influenced by strict NDA’s to which Cloudtag adheres..” and again and again… illogical.
IF the SFO wish to question Amit Ben-Haim on the origins of the deposited $50M, then of course they will not be influenced by any quotes of “soz, we can’t tell you.. its NDA”
*find myself
Appropriate steps have been taken Whispering and it is nice to see that several others have also taken up the chalice of trying to right Amit Ben-Haim's wrongs, by several different approaches. The more the merrier.
You have it wrong Whispering, that 'on this subject we can agree to disagree', as I facing myself constantly disagreeing with your opinions, which I tend to summarise as totally illogical. The agent/s being restricted to your quoted "NDA clauses" is sadly comical. It is totally illogical, as are your arguments to support any of your opinions.
*Shlomo
Anybody got his email address or is that also.. NDA ?
"..Idiots on twitter making declarations of trying to contact his family?..''
I fully support this approach.
Many many good peeps are contemplating that Amit Ben-Haim has a serious mental problem. There is factual evidence that shows that 50% of the notifications that he issues are falsehoods. That he has been consistently reckless with the truth is a known established fact. The supposition is, that he needs looking after.
Who better to do this than brother Shalom Ben-Haim with has access to the facilities to allow ABH to get proper treatment ?
The last ‘agent’ working for the company was Cairns in their capacity as Nomad. And who then abruptly cancelled any further dealings with CTAG, effectively removing the company from a London listing.
What then was the ‘recklessness’ seen by the Nomad, which warranted them abruptly pulling the plug on Amit Ben-Haim ?
Possibly a similar performance perhaps to that which he has repeatedly delivered to shareholders…
I would suggest that the agent is none other than SB Corporate Finance Partners Limited.
That Amit Ben-Haim’s company, which has only 1 sole director on its books ie ABH himself, is then doing the financial management of offshore funds, the origins of which, is at best, questionable.
A question for the FCA perhaps ?
Is it normal practice for one of their registered UK financial management companies to then act as regulatory overseers for their own off-shore transactions.. ?
30 Jan.2024 ‘..the paying agent processing the transactions are experiencing difficulties reconciling the number of shares in issue due to a miscalculation from a UK broker..’
Zilch, nada, sweet FA to do with anything resembling NDA
And sadly, at current best estimates, looks a lot more to do with fraudulent behaviour.
2nd Nov 2023 ‘..the company is pleased to herewith confirm details for the distribution of the first payment tranche to shareholders for its $50M licensing agreement..’
This has absolutely nowt to do with the client’s NDA.
It is totally wrong to then try impose the suggestion that the reason Amit Ben-Haim’s distribution agent can not proceed is due to ‘regulatory requirements’ &/or ‘strict adherence to NDA guidelines’..
Soz, but that now is a Lol.
Agents are used for the distribution process.
These have absolutely nowt to do with the client.
Absolutely nowt to do with any NDA.
And now we have ‘secret agents’ allegedly distributing the proceeds but courtesy that their name can not be disclosed can not therefore proceed with the distribution ?!!
What on earth has NDA got to do with shareholder distribution arrangements ???
20 Oct.2023 ‘the first payment is for its $50M licensing agreement. The licensee is s global electronics business with no footprint in MedTech…. distribution details will follow by week commencing 30th October 2023.’
The NDA has nowt to do with how any proceeds are distributed.
FCA regulation would not be needed in distributing shares in a private company.
Nor would a mystery benefactor of $50M need to be explained.
Nor would the mystery owner/s of the additional c.300M shares need to be explained.
Amit Ben-Haim’s consistent recklessness for the truth then fully warrants a deep dive. And at which point, the bio gets quickly re-written.
‘wow’ would have been a more appropriate sign-off. Soz.
So far, all we have seen is a regular consistent trail of notices centred on falsehoods. No matter which way you try and look at it, Amit Ben-Haim has been consistently reckless with the truth.
So the recently posted concern of Amit Ben-Haim having ‘received $50M from a mystery benefactor whom may or may not have then access to the additional c.300M shares that have arisen (during the same period that the unproven SaaP/DaaP products were aired) from an unregulated, unregistered & un-communicative off-shore account’...
..has then resulted in Amit Ben-Haim rewriting his bio to emphasise ‘regulatory compliance’. Lol
‘strict NDA’ which then prevents any payments to shareholders from the $50M that had been deposited, over 1 year ago.
‘regulatory compliance’ which then prevents any UK registered brokers being contacted by Amit Ben-Haim’s agent/s
Waisted time & effort of updating one’s bio, perhaps then suggests of the frailties that mind currently carries.
SaaS was originally aired in the Notice issued Jan 2020 & high-lighted as 'the primary focus of the new platform', centred on obesity management & was being touted as the 'most accurate energy expansion readings (Kcal) on CTAG's 'propriety heart rate algorithm' that captures date from 3RD PARTY devices, ie. not the Onitor.
the SaaS tool then monitors physical activities from these 3rd party devices & which is filtered thru CTAG algo's. At that time it looked quite promising with a side-line in Shlomo's data-controlled food & propriety health company which was GOJI Food Solutions. All aimed at obesity measures.
Then Amit got involved.
Being recently accredited with the FCA still warrants a positive (imv)
But now the FCA register states "Regulatory approval no ,longer required.. the individual is no longer in a role that requires regulatory approval"
Still very murky then.
& as per the 22.03.24
"..have not been issued as planned, due to guidance received from the paying agent.."
which effectively states that ABH informed himself to stop the payment..
ABH is still reported as a director for SB..
And up until August of last year, he was also in the FCA approved role of MLRO the Money Laundering Reporting Officer for SB Corporate Finance Partners Ltd.
The above is all then a positive.