Member Info for donnodertrader

the announcement of the alignment of...

it isn't just the last two rns (s) that have had a disappointing impact: it is the last five. I still believe all the fundamentals are in place for a substantial rise. But, it will require the announcement the alignment of figures on production capacity, orders, and sales.

Does anyone know when we should expect the AGM?

Paolo were you identified as talking de-ramping nonsense before and you are at it again. I see that yet again some idiot has ticked his post. So it is clear they are working in pairs!! Poor idiots, how stupid do you think we are?

Who was the idiot that ticked Paolo's post??

Paolo you need to inform yourself a little bit more on the reason why the French are not reimbursing the test. You don't seem to be aware that the test has the approval of the Institute Pasteur.

can I remind the bb that this has previously been posted. it came from a French site and indicates that there is due to be an update on finances up to the end of March on the 3rd June - Wednesday.

it shows below the graph 'date de sortie' as 3rd June for the period up till March 2020

https://fr.investing.com/equities/novacyt-earnings

any implications for the share of notification of sell and buy

it shows below the graph 'date de sortie' as 3rd June for the period up till March 2020

https://fr.investing.com/equities/novacyt-earnings

on a French site a date of the 3rd June was given for releasing information I cannot find the details at the moment

were you able to find all of today's rns(s) thanks

is anyone trying to check rns on the lse website? it is changed and I cannot navigate it. anyone know what is going on?

it is a holiday in France, but the Bourse is open

careful it is a Euro price 3.55

lol that was in quotation marks from the article you posted!

my understanding is that novacyt has 100% sensitivity. and about 98% specificity

but if 99 truly positive and 1 wrong (negative) that would be 99% sensitivity

Doc thanks and pleased be assured I am not trying to argue against you just trying to get it right. the following is a quote from the article you posted and that is the one I previously read.

'A test that is 100% sensitive means all diseased individuals are correctly identified as diseased i.e. there are no false negatives.'

'A test that is 100% sensitive means all diseased individuals are correctly identified as diseased i.e. there are no false negatives.'

I have no medical background. but I looked it up recently. I understood that sensitivity was the ability to correctly identify a positive result.