Member Info for Doc83

Hamm - care to answer this yet?

"Hamm - so you're not going to answer me then?

You say how can someone be invested when they are so negative? You were the most negative person on MATD for 2022, but were invested.

Please explain."

Hamm - care to answer this yet?

"Hamm - so you're not going to answer me then?

You say how can someone be invested when they are so negative? You were the most negative person on MATD for 2022, but were invested.

Please explain."

Thornogson - I didn't post on any LSE board since 9.37am. Very busy day today, sadly involving hospitals, nothing fun.

Yet for some reason, WOS decides to go stalk me again over on the SNG board at 2.30pm! Do you not think it's about time you all had a word with him? I appreciate the guy is unwell, but it's not right.

Oooo, more than twice the number of posts than trades. I wonder if we can get it to treble.

Full of sneaky ones here!

Roger, you can get 4.2% now in a gilt. Mostly free from tax... equivalent to 7%+ for a higher/additional rate tax payer!

So many green boxes, on all the boards :D

Squawk squawk.

La Di Da.

What a lovely day today.

6.3p.

Strolling along now.

But actually, I've never been stalked before. So it's a new experience.

Not really. But then the "derampers" (realists) are outnumbers by about 100/1, so no surprise.

I tell you what the derampers don't do... and that's stalk and go over to other boards!

"Friday is my guess."

Fair play, Hamm. At least you said guess and not guaranteed!

"i feel the posters who comment negatively are balls deep and hide it through ****ging off everyone and boasting about they’re alright but everyone is doomed."

Absolutely. We all saw Prof embarrassingly lose his cool the other day. A trader who doesn't care wouldn't react like that. But I've taken Dunk's advice and don't read or reply anymore!

I'm not happy with 9p but accepted a long time ago that this would be a longer term hold. I've got my position, I'll challenge the BOD at the AGM but other than that it's a waiting game.

Hamm: “Or they simply have already left. BP, Al I, etc keep saying matd is a bad investment, too much trouble, too many failures, too much risk etc etc.

Just beaware that they are here for a reason, and that is too obvious they are here to get your shares cheap. They aren't here to save you or help you, not the likes of docs. “

So is that what you were doing in 2022? Deramping and causing mayhem so you could pick up cheap shares?

BS - well said.

Wigster: “Quite - Why are we not mentioned on the agenda?”

Because we’re NOT on the bloody agenda!

This is going to rumble off for some weeks yet. Best to have Thornogson’s outlook and be prepared to wait. Except that we’ve already been waiting a long time already and the radio silence from MB is pretty poor.

“ If share holders knew the guarantee on anything they'll be millionaires”

So why do you and others continually and constantly use the word guaranteed in your posts?

So these oil companies are specifically mentioned in the agendas? Would we therefore not expect MATD to be named if it were to be discussed?

To expand on that, when Thornogson says Mongolia needs Petro Matad, why? Serious question, I’d say MATD were to cease to exist tomorrow, could the MG not get another oil company in to extract the oil?

“They want oil, they need oil, they need Petro Matad. ”

What is Petro Matad’s USP over other oil explorers and producers?