Member Info for Dobbo777

So we’re just kicking the can down the road?

Plenty of conjecture on PPP but no discussions on the impact of a No vote. If the share issuance is voted down what does this mean for PPP meeting financial obligations, it's financial stability and viability, audit and suspension? These are my concerns. Its all well and good taking a moral stand but not to our own detriment.

Totally agree. Why vote now when there is possibility of news in the pipeline? My concern is the consequence of a 'No' vote. Would this be the final nail in the coffin? My entry price was 1.3p so happy to take a dilution if it means we are back to trading. Yes there are many unknowns and RNS releases have been misleading, poorly constructed and ambiguous but I have nearly £30k tied up in PPP and don't want this squandered on reckless voting until we have further operational updates provided.

At last, after all the vitriol from the usual suspects a sensible synopsis from Sharebel 👏

Pennpetroenergy.com site was first indexed by Google 9 years ago, in essence this marks the moment the website becomes part of the searchable web ecosystem managed by Google. Make of that what you will....

Dealer, I’m not that smart I’m afraid, and I’m very confused

From Google AI, take your pick....I'm going for nbr 2

Upon reviewing the two websites, https://www.chevron.com/what-we-do/energy/oil-and-natural-gas and https://pennpetroenergy.com/, it becomes apparent that the Pennpetro Energy website has significantly copied the design, layout, and even some textual elements from Chevron's "Oil and Natural Gas" page.

There are several potential reasons, none of which are typically legitimate or ethical:

1. Attempt to appear more credible or established: Chevron is a major, globally recognized energy company. By copying its website design, Pennpetro Energy might be trying to associate itself with Chevron's reputation and size, leading visitors to believe they are a more substantial or trustworthy entity than they might otherwise appear.

2. Lack of internal design and content resources: It's quicker and cheaper to copy an existing successful design than to develop an original one from scratch. This can be a sign of limited resources or a desire to cut corners.

3. Deception or misrepresentation: In some cases, such blatant copying can be a tactic to mislead investors or potential partners into thinking the company has a similar scale of operations or expertise as the copied company.

4. Poor business practices: It demonstrates a lack of originality and potentially a disregard for intellectual property. Companies that engage in such practices may also have other questionable business ethics.

Bobrad, Put your box of crayons down for a moment.....Did you know there are spaces after commas? Do you understand the difference between "your" and "you're"? Remember to use a question mark when asking questions. These details are crucial if you want to establish credibility.

Https://globalvision.pt/#pg-7-1

GV enters into a interim caretaker role of Nobel petroleum companies and stand by rigs

What’s your source Affirm? If accurate surely this would require an RNS operational update?

If the Company Was Struck Off by Companies House (for non-compliance)

You can apply for "administrative restoration" within 6 years of dissolution.

Is the final date a ‘hard’ date for strike off or are they merely at that point ‘at risk’ of being struck off?

Recently updated his LinkedIn aviator with a mug shot, interesting….dare I say promising

The moon? I’d be happy with Monmouth in South Wales

I don’t believe Lunn would conduct an AGM without Auditor's Report, there would be a lynching after all we have gone through

What’s the situation with resource bonds 11 ltd (now in administration) a company set up by Ppp to issue bonds. What was the value of bonds issued and do we know the value being pursued by creditors?

Agree! So many toxic comments and spats going on here, it’s like a freaking playground. I’ve read RNS several times and for me it is logical and reasonably positive

B, 12p

I’m afraid I only drink champagne Tiger…..

Difference between you and I Badrad is I have a successful job and have accumulated reasonable wealth. I don’t need to derive pleasure from other people’s misfortune. You on the other hand, the keyboard warrior, need attention in your sad Non-descript unfulfilled world

the more i read the more confused i become. i’m in for 300,000 shares which i cannot afford to lose (i accept responsibility for my recklessness). i just don’t understand how a 30 year revenue stream on prime texas oil gushing real estate can go so **** up