RE: RNS29 Aug 2023 08:19
If you have 'big negatives' why continue to invest in something you have a perennial downer on?
In any case, ANA has the rare distinction of a small company that is not endlessly and recklessly tapping up shareholders for funds, unlike others. They've managed to get themselves to serious clinical medical trials in Scotland with an eye on the NHS and without bothering shareholders much at all.
Yes, there are a lot of shares, yes, many are in sticky hands (there are pros and cons to that) and yes it's an incredibly boring and frustrating plod, yes it's annoying that we seem stuck on 0.0050p after years of progress . But the stickies are there because they've invested in the end goal. Is it worth a punt? You decide. Nobody has to sink much money in here, it's dirt cheap and not requiring of anyone putting a pound of flesh on the table. It's a company that you'd buy a few within your comfort zone, put away for a year at least and reassess. That's not to say things won't happen in the meantime. Good, sp driving things. And yes they may fundraise but again, it's not like, oh sheet, they're coming round with the begging bowl AGAIN. I used to invest in AIM miners and we were tapped up for brass nearly every 6 months, it was horrendous. It's a breeze here thus far in comparison .