Member Info for djwall1s

Fundamental cock up or oversight because they got a bit ahead of themselves doing other things. Paperwork misplaced or late. It happens. Np point spitting chips now. Ask Parry if you're so angry. His phone number is there and you can attend the pres too. I will be.

Yes, I think the legalities of any such change is what will take a bit more time.

It's in, quote: 'full compliance with AIM Rule 14.'. That is the only rule used here, no 'investigations' or other rules quoted. Length of time will be a bugbear for many but of no major consequence to those holding for gains further down the line.

To me it's someone caught in a suspension blowing off steam and hoping to force an evacuation on the bell by cementing doubt. I don't have a problem with reasonable opinion but honestly, seen this classic tactic used time and again on these boards. We're day one of a suspension and already SEA is drawing worst case conclusions. I just can't....

Dilution, ah, this old wardrum again...what part of AIM investing don't you understand? Companies need to finance themselves, it's no mystery. If this company (and it will) dilutes in the future we are coming off a share issue of circa 500 million. It's NOTHING compared to many, many other AIM companies. Wake me up when we have 5 BILLION shares please (and I've been in a few, and who still did well at some point or another). It's hardly the giant problem you're making it out to be, esp. when it's a natural part of life on AIM. But when there's nothing left SEA returns to his cylical dilution topics. Any dilution should be offset by other counterbalances in terms of newsflow and progress. That's what businesses do. I think SEA is locked in here, hence the sudden reappearance.

Wrong thread, soz.

You seem to have all the answers. Why not consult yourself?

Give the lad a chance!

Nigel is a great speaker and lets hope they put on a combined front.

The Yahoo target is as pointless as every other thing that's not fresh from the company. There are all manner of agendas, Yahoo never gave their reasoning/workings and are not privy to the future in the same way the average deramper is not privy to its twists and turns. This is AIM and we were worth 3 times more when we had a lot less! Go figure.

It could go either way - and for all manner of reasons, not least things might have changed at the last moment. Though I find it hard to believe they would not have known this was coming and still opted to be a main presenter at the show? But there is nothing we can do now until the company comes out of suspension, regardless. I like to be optimistic though.

Yeah, I think the legalities of change in this area is what will take time up; paperwork, waiting on other departments to process files, yada, yada. LION will be in a queue. On readmission, a lot depends on how far along we are with newsflow/content.

'Lionsgold Capital Investments'...... I really like this name.

Dealer, When Echo suspended, for example, at the end of October it took only 1.5 months but it still retained its status and didn't mention a 'fundamental change of business'. We appear to be fundamentally changing our status. So I'd guess the procedure takes a little longer. 3-4 months ain't bad and things may be tied up sooner, who knows.

Lol, woody, I haven't seen you as animated in ages. :D I certainly don't class this as bad news. The language is all wrong for that. Naturally, for some there will be uncertainty, as happens any time an AIM share suspends. But the wording is standard corporate restructuring related and tied in with a relevant rule. No more no less. Re: the 'fundamental change of business', the obvious supposition would be that LION could be become a pure e-money company rather than a miner, and those mines may be in the process of being offloaded. Again, only hot air, and one opinion in an ocean of hundreds. But I'd guess CP wants to build a business rather than wreck it.

It's so blatantly straightforward, almost boringly so, discussing readmission at the end. I'm more interested to see how newsflow will be managed during the summer. My intention was to hold all year and into 2019 hopefully. I wouldn't have sold any time soon anyway, full value may, I think, take time, with ups and downs along the way, naturally.

Nobody has effect, either way. It's in the company's hands now and I trust it's a pretty straightforward corporate process that was likely expected given the nature of the deal. I don't think it negates news being released. We wait and see.

Interesting why it's still your concern though? Why are you not out there living your full life with all this profit you claim to make? I think we know why. :/

I mean, that's the point of being a holder, rather than a trader. Do you ever say anything remotely positive anyway John?

But yeah, feel free to pick your own worst case scenario. Obviously.