Member Info for djwall1s

I can't. The damn filter button has broken. I got told by Admin to remove some from my filter box but despite removing loads there's no joy. Like I say, if these people are so concerned they should damn well buy tickets to the Pres (like I did) and make the effort to go and ask questions and join in, rather than trying to sound as if they know more than they do (all talk) on here.

does it feel as if those shouting the loudest into the vacuum are the ones most scared of any potential good that will happen here? Trying to convince themselves there are problems so..idk, it makes you feel better sleeping? I'm tired of saying just wait and see. Nobody knows and not one of us has a crystal ball. If you got caught out and stuck in some short or spread bet nightmare that's your issue. The company never said 'trade this, please'. Most of this garbage is of zero interest to me as I know CP and the BoD will have a plan, to grow the business like all AIM companies try to and eventually (hopefully) get off of it. I'll take whatever comes but if you're THAT concerned SEA, will and the rest of the bashers, turn up at the presentation and ask your questions, like investors are bothering to do.

I'm happy with anything that makes shorters and paid bashers hilariously waste/fret away even more of their own time. This share will be opening when its ready and there's not a thing you lot can do about it. Have a nice day!

One trade? Difficult to say but it is what it is. Hardly matters anyway. In terms of the suspension itself it seems as if that isn't the issue for people so much as the length of time. Echo took one-and-a-half months to RTO but then it wasn't changing it's fundamental status as we are. I think as log as newsflow isn't affected and we're kept in the loop it'll just be a case of waiting to relist. Like I say the big plus for me was no other rule got mentioned nor words like 'breach' and no fine for anything. And yes, I'd imagine if the company knew it was T/o TRAC then it'd be anticipating a period of suspension anyway.

We'll hear much sooner than that. He's pretty much free to say what he likes now as there's no market movement. Presentation should be interesting.

The RNS indicates release is on track to go ahead this quarter so we can take heart from that.

I'm not on Twitter as a member but someone is saying they cannot find Lionsgold listed at Companies House. It can be found under Goldbloc LTD https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/07089561

On the plus side, deano, the way the RNS was worded, if it had been LION's deliberate fault or something underhand or devious had gone on, I think it'd be there in print as 'breach' and I don't believe the regulatory services would gloss over that or give LION special favour. We'd be up there getting more than a tap on the shoulder imo. The lack of any other rules mentioned is a bonus too. It could be as woody says (that the Kolar docs just need redrafting - and imo maybe got overlooked/mistimed) and/or there's been a possible breakdown in comms somewhere and something has got missed. They've been given the time to sort it out and have suspended accordingly whilst that is sorted. I call that playing by the book to rectify it. And in all honesty if the news build is good/great/exciting over the summer it'll be good to not have it traded to death on sharp swings. We might actually be able to build up to some sort of value platform on opening. If the newsflow is not up to perceived 'scratch' then again, we haven't lost anything during his time as not trading.

Guys, you're jumping way ahead of yourselves. Chill and let the process proceed, there's all summer to release news without it actually being played like a fiddle. Also, nope, the question put to Railsbank was "Are @LIONSGOLDdotcom @CameronJParry @nigelverdon @railsbank still attending on May 19th? #LION #LIONSGOLD #GOLDBLOC💳" Aka, are all of you (inc LION) attending. Railsbank said yes. So far so good.

S/He say yes.... @Share_Talk 24h24 hours ago Lionsgold Limited (AIM #LION) Suspension of Trading 1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes Reply 1 Retweet 2 Like 4 @Amanbadboy77 23h23 hours ago Are @LIONSGOLDdotcom @CameronJParry @nigelverdon @railsbank still attending on May 19th? #LION #LIONSGOLD #GOLDBLOC💳 1 reply 0 retweets 1 like Reply 1 Retweet Like 1 @railsbank Follow Follow @railsbank Replying to @Amanbadboy77 @Share_Talk and 3 others Yes 2:20 PM - 11 May 2018

I don't know deano, where did you say you wanted it to fail? I don't remember talking directly to you. I mean if you recognise yourself in something that wasn't even said at you then who's the fool? Shrugs.

I always get weirded out by these people who take great glee in wishing something they seem to hold no physical interest in, fail. I mean, fine, you might hate a thing so great, move along. But continued onslaughts just become agenda. I mean I comment rarely on anything but this, because I have no interest in anything else and why antagonise someone elses' forum.

Are you saying you rang the number and talked to someone at the company? Because I find it hard to believe anyone would be yelling 'multibagger' down the phone at an enquiry. Are you implying it from a positive phone call?

Yeah I mean I've seen other RNS where it's just put in black and white: 'XX found in breach of Rule XX".

Seconded Cloud. Thank you.

A readmission cost of 500k-1m would wipe many an AIM company out!

"Trading on AIM for the under-mentioned securities has been temporarily suspended from 11/05/2018 7:30am, pending full compliance with AIM Rule 14." Full compliance. The insinuating to me being compliance is pending but needs completing.

where an AIM company in 2016 fined �75k for Rule 31 breach: https://www.fieldfisher.com/publications/2017/01/aim-company-fined-75-000-for-breach-of-rule-31 "The fundamental purpose of AIM Rule 31 is to ensure that the nomad is kept fully aware of developments and can fulfil its regulatory role and responsibilities to the LSE, to advise and guide the AIM company. In this instance the LSE found that the Company failed to inform its nomad and seek advice regarding a series of business developments." Our's is simply a Rule 14. If there were breachs or other issues, surely other Rules would have been added to this RNS? They're not going to soft soap us because we're any more special the the next company on AIM. Rules is rules. The text in the RNS leans towards a compliance issue re: readmission doc. As woody cleverly pointed out, it would need redrafting in order to define a 'fundamental business change'.

"The Company has fundementally become a financial technology company which differs from Liongolds admission document to AIM which is in facy Kolar Golds admission document." A really good point.

I know, but as we know these things do happen. Good lord, look at the fiascos that go on in banking and chain stores, daily. Chill. It's a rule 14 not the end of the planet.