Member Info for Digittt

Not 3p...0.3p. That might have been how they were being paid for the raise though.

Didn't they simply underwrite the raise and got stuck holding a bunch of the shares? But that wouldn't have been a good story for Echo if that was the case.

Youknowitall....will be very happy if you do!

I had dismissed the numbers quoted on holdings as I truly see quoting big numbers as a rampers delight - ...sorry, nearly made that work. If that is your holding, then that is substantial - I'm probably at a quarter of that (if I remember the numbers you quoted correctly enough). But nursing a near 6 figure loss, which you aren't!

I look forward to the news then and more than happy to be wrong! Martin did come across decently in the recent interview, but you can probably tell I've been beaten up by this share too long. The fork-tongued snake-oil saleswoman who came before him also came across decently.

Challenge me as to whether I'm invested here tells us more about you than me. I'm a LTH who's averaged down to hold a decent chunk of shares. I do think things will turn here, and that's why I'm here. But I don't believe in the excitable stuff oozing out of the posts.

We haven't completed the bond restructuring I don't think. I'm hopeful of that - but someone correct me if I'm wrong. Our VAT streamlining is good in theory - but I want to see material amounts returned. The actual amount returned that they quoted in an earlier RNS (I think RNS) was insignificant relative to the large amount we are expecting. Campo Limite information has been sparse, but that's how this company has behaved with every turkey/duster it drilled and tested for the last few years.

Volume may be up, and if it's up for a month or 2 from here, then I'd say great, let's start trying to apply our algorithmic analysis of the trading patterns that allow us to get excited about a 4% rise even when it's within the spread. That being said, if the volume is up for that period, the spread would have narrowed.

Martin Hull has a lot of work still to do to build credibility in company management. He can start by showing he is committed and believes in the company by buying a truckload of shares. Real, personal money at risk would make me sit up. Oh...and video footage of them burning the painting of Fiona that was commissioned post one of their prior fund raises.

The volume is the turnover from the issuance - will be surprised if it's anything else. Any directors buying? Why not, it's so cheap... The spread is massive on this share so a 5% movement is meaningless. While we are certainly happy to have a bunch of new investors on the board and new money coming in, those who sit there permanently saying "it's imminent" and trying to build an amusement park ride out of what is normal for this share (point on volume taken), fall into my over-enthusiastic rampers bucket. They are also burning too much energy to be LTH's (even new ones)...

And they're back. Let me know when there's something with a 5 at the front of it, that might indicate more real movement.

Hah...that made me chuckle. They do seem to know it all. Agreed on both counts...are we waiting on news on the bond restructuring being agreed (to follow the debt deferral)? Presume bond holders would have had to have given some comfort to new shareholders (from the raise) on the chance of success....ie suggesting they're not going to wipe out the equity. But I may be confusing my guesses across other investments!

The LTH are keeping pretty quiet here. Beaten spouse syndrome?

There seems to be a lot of hope here pinned on CBR as if it's the key to the company / the world. Let me remind you that none of the LTH are here because of CBR....it didn't exist 9 months ago. Yes there are things to be excited about with CBR, for sure. But it's just another part of the portfolio.

Actually...that may just be my data feed being all wonky.

Did someone on this board mention Heat Biologics? Ouch! (as a counter to Greenwich LifeSciences)

AMug....agreed. In my defense I only took the bait yesterday as for whatever reason the Hemo main page on LSE filter was haphazard. Sometimes it filtered the Badger who has another name, other times the messages came up. Confused me a little, but LSE has had its bad days over the last while. That's not just the day of bad posts it's also the days where LSE didn't feel like pitching up for work.

Swimming, that made me laugh and I had to go and see the post myself. That's hilarious. Folks allowed to change their minds, but that is Suzi/Badger being ridiculously polemic. Suzi has concluded that there is total mal-intent on Mint and Vlad's side on the CLN's from the outset. That or that Hemo cannot deliver on value.

Big call, but if that's the call, then Suzi - truly bugger off. If you don't trust management now, you're never going to trust them, so you're only here to short and whine.

Yep. My stomach is front and foremost at the moment (pun intended)...not just because it's nearly Xmas. Took my profits on some mining shares in my SIPP , so now sitting on a decent chunk of cash. Added a few more Hemo last week, but am fighting the urge to commit more. I'm already way over-exposed and the last 2 shares I was over-exposed to cost me very dearly...

Correct, but what we've all got to have the stomach for is the ride. We know we have a fantastic portfolio of potential treatments - so just having one work will make it all worth it. But it will take quite the constitution to ride through multiple knocks if/when we have setbacks. First test will be EL...if deal happens, we're all happy. If it doesn't, for sure we have the cash to progress it ourselves, but the sentiment of why EL didn't come to the party will hurt for a while.

Yep, that sounds right.

On today's hopes....my screen is indicating a high trade already at 9p today...but it's also showing the low trade of 9p ..errr..

Don't remember 16p being the high?

Your last purchase seemed to help us all. Do something for the greater good and buy another 30k.