Member Info for Digitalis

Well I'm sure Superbarnet will be along shortly to point out again that there is a gap to 96p that should fill this week (actually 98.45p if you take the peak buy price today). Pretty standard market behaviour following a breakout, although I'm not sure that is finished, just a pause for breath not helped by the weekend. MACD crossed on Friday, there is slack in the RSI it peaked on Friday at 72.5 but I expect it to be lower today when the free charts update. The channel indicator is upward but still currently in the same flag on the previous flag pole following the pull back. So all in all there's plenty of indicators to the upside at the moment, without any news. None of which is a prediction, merely indicators.

Follow your own research.

Well, I think we can agree on that. Consensus has been reached.

Then I am at a loss to understand why you felt the need to tell me that?

I didn't ignore your question, I answered it. Altruism for the benefit of others.

Why would you think your posts could be classified as gaslighting? That is on you, not me. I do not need to identify any specific poster that I was referring to, there have been several over the last year, it would not be chivalrous to single anyone out.

Looking a real possibility, just set a new 52-week high of 98.45p

I didn't accuse you of anything? Do please try to read my post properly, where did I mention you at all? Seems that you are projecting your own interpretation.

I looked at their accounts to pass information on to others who were interested, not because I was specifically. It is called altruism (sorry seaangler)

Good morning Spicy on this fine summer's day. What on earth are you on about? I've said before, I haven't wondered what they are up to because I don't care. They are irrelevant.

Oh my! What have I started.

It is truly satisfying to see the refreshing optimism on the board lately.

Wouldn't know Kpa1, I don't listen to LBC.

Seaangler apologies the words just appear natural to me after dealing with all the posts that had been an exercise in floccinaucinihilipilification.

:-D :-D :-D

Jeff, it has been classic gaslighting to try and make people doubt their own convictions. I can only hope that I have been able to play some small part in de-bunking the more egregious attempts along with the actions of others, Bilbo, Wookie, Satellite, seaangler, troublesome and yourself. And anyone else I've missed not deliberately.

I know I saw at least one post from an infrequent poster who indicated their gratefulness at those who had put the countervailing positive views, once the sp started to rise from the 30p range. Gaslighting always tries to isolate and make individuals doubt themselves, unpleasant behaviour.

Brave to make predictions but at least you are prepared to stick your neck out, I think you previously said £1.30 by mid-Aug. I hope you are correct.

I'll only go as far as saying the technical data I've been looking at seems to suggest that there is a greater probability or more upside than downside at the moment. Coupling that with all the recent positive announcements suggest a good outcome. Positive year-end results in August could have a significant impact.

Good luck with your wife's ISA, Kitesurfer. I'm very much enjoying the fact that my holding is sitting in my ISA. Bilbo mentioned this funny thing called Capital Gains Tax the other day. I'm not sure what it is?

As for Helikon, lots of nonsense being spouted at the moment about exotic trading strategies. According to companies house, Helikon is not listed as a parent company of any other entity that I can see. Nor do the directors have other directorships except one and that additional company also is not listed as an officer in any other company. There's only so far I can investigate complex corporate structuring, but if there is "another" company holding a long position for Helikon then I struggle to see how it circumvents the law.

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/MAR/1/6.html?date=2016-03-07

So I think we can put that nonsense to bed.

How can I account for gains from a long position that is not proven to exist? If they went long at 30-40p they would have had to short the same number of shares to keep their disclosed position the same. Therefore, if they have a long position it ha to be taken either at the same time as the bulk of their short or beforehand.

It would be inappropriate to speculate on what, if any, long position they hold until they declare it, which would mean it would need to be over 3% I believe?

All I can conclude is that they did well in the reported year, I cannot conclude that means they are doing well at the moment, that is a logical fallacy "post hoc ergo procter hoc" - you almost have the full set.

Very true marker72 and why I have been saying for months they are irrelevant. However, I just get tired of the narrative that they are some kind of omniscient demigod-like organisation. They are gambling the same as everyone and which way the bet turns out no-body knows.

And they extracted just under £68 Million in dividends leaving around £35 Million cash at bank or equivalents as at Sept 2024, just enough to cover the exposure here up to approx £2 as I said a few days ago (if they don't have to pay anything else). Remembering that FCA declarations are net positions so if they have a long position then that actually means they are short even more shares.

If I worked for them, I'd be worried about how they were going to pay my wages when they extracted most of the profits of my efforts as dividend.

Yes, please be cautious with AI responses. I had a client I'd given a load of information to who asked me if I used it (never) and then proceeded to run a query and give me the responses. I then had to spend 2 hours, ripping it to shreds to point out why everything it had provided was wrong or not relevant.'

Ok my line of work is niche, but even so.

@Troublesome, shh, I was hoping nobody would notice. I realised I'd mistyped the lyric as soon as I pressed Post Message but there's no edit function. So I was going to try to style it out.

I was also hoping nobody remembered the rest of the lyrics which aren't quite so positive but no matter. I do prefer mine though :-D

Yes it has made for a refreshing change, to be able to comment on the prospects and exchange valuable insights without having to content with accusations of ramping.

Mamas & Papas - Monday, Monday, be good to me...

Very ouch - I feel your pain, especially if that was a lot of profit that you ploughed back in. Best of luck on recovering it

Yeah it is pretty dull here, wish I was still in Croatia. Monday is looking very sunny though, hopefully in more ways than one.

I'd just add, nothing I said is advice or a prediction of what will happen. Even a 99% probability of something happening means that sometimes it doesn't and I'm in no way saying probabilities are that high.