RE: First CA H2 train enters service16 Sep 2025 18:42
That was a genuine question for you to expand on your Nuclear statement.
However, I truly hope that the shorts are relying on that quality of analysis - we have not a thing to worry about, they will be toast in the fullness of time.
For your benefit, it is clear MTucker was correct with the perceptive question.
You clearly don't realise that in the 1990s Nuclear made up 24.5 percent of the Electricity Fuel Mix at a peak of 12.7 GW in 1995 Today it is less than half that with around 5-6 GW. all due to go off-line by 2030. The new build is projected to be around 10 GW by 2035 (a myth) none of it is operational. Hinkley C was meant to be generating ibn 2017 and Sizewell C in early 2020s. I realistically doubt 1kWh will be generated before 2030 from the new build. The SMR if they ever happen will take at least 10 years to get built more like 20. New Nuclear just isn't going to happen at the scale needed to electrify heating and driving. That is before you even consider the massive demand ramp-up for data centres.
I really hope this is what the shorts have set all their bets on. As this is just the UK, let us not forget Germany, ITM's primary market at the moment won't use nuclear. Hydrogen is their only option to get off fossil fuels from unstable regimes (ME, RU, USA).
Is that the extent of the quality of your analysis?
I can barely contain my mirth. The shorts, if that is the kind of analysis they are banking on are so far off track it is pure comedy.