Member Info for dgdg1

smalltrader, you say "They would first check efficacy and if that is met then they would verify safety record" - please explain how you know that is actually the order they would do it? Not saying you're wrong, but how do you know?

He contradicted himself, and I think the only way to resolve that is to say that he wasn't speaking so precisely. So when he said at the beginning that it's moving forward, he just meant that it hasn't yet been rejected (as opposed to the first therapy which failed). So that tallies with him later saying that he doesn't know if it's moving into phase 3. And when he said they're waiting for safety data, that may too have been slightly inaccurate and it might not just be safety data they are waiting for but also efficacy data. Unfortunately this seems realistic as he mis-spoke once previously about a month or two ago, so he clearly doesn't know how to be precise when he talks. Not a deramp, you can all disagree with me if you like, form your own opinions.

What's the link to see Castro speaking please?

Yes on the clinicaltrials you reference site it does say Phase III, my question is that it says the study started on Jan 12, so it definitely can't be talking about the Phase III of the Activ-2 trial as at best that will only be starting around now, also the page says the last update was on August 31 at which point Phase III had definitely not begun? The answer is to be found at the top of the page where it says that it is referring to the Sprinter trial i.e. not the Activ -2 trial. I hope this information doesn't cause the price to go back down but that's the truth of the matter.

Or the side-effects came by chance, unrelated to the placebo

Does anyone know if it's possible to access the analysts q&a - either a recording or a transcript? I wonder if something was said to them that helped cause the latest fall. In the absence of that it seems like a good buying opportunity, shame I have too many already to allow myself to buy more. The mere delay of a couple of months for test results is hardly a reason for the price to go down by 15% or so - or am I missing something?

Looking at the transcript, he said "hopefully" 3 times. FIrst: "once hopefully, the dust does settle on COVID-19, then we feel....". Second: "we feel that having generated hopefully, positive data from our SPRINTER clinical trial and ACTIV-2 trial clinical trial..." Third: "and we're waiting for a review of the data, which hopefully will allow us to progress from the early part of this trial..."

The first instance is not even relevant to the context of being hopeful that the drug works. So effectively he said it twice, which seems both nothing to worry about and actually perfectly reasonable. So I can't see what people are getting worked up about.

Just 6 more absurd posts to go and it will be a nice round 500 negative posts in a few months from booth. All in the name of helping us understand the "facts" from a "long-term shareholder" who is of course completely disinterested. Such selflessness, such altruism - just amazing.

Meelie, couild you tell us please how to access the Numis report? Thanks

You are extrapolating from currently weekly US hospitalisations of 87,000 a week. But just a couple of months ago on 4th July that number was just 14,580, a sixth of the present level. So that shows how quickly and how much the numbers can fluctuate. When boosters have been rolled out along with the new delta-specific vaccines, things may get very much under control. Yes, unfortunately covid probably won't be wiped out but the numbers could be much much lower in just a few months (when the product could be arriving on the market). So maybe it will be just 5000 a week of which 2000 will be given SNG, or 100k yearly. Admittedly this could still produce a yearly profit of £100m (assuming £1000 profit per person), which is not too bad. But I am just saying that to work based on today's rate of hospitalisations doesn't seem scientific.

Lots more bashing from liambooth along with just some slight tactical retreating on the level of bashing and repeating his old convoluted arguments for the umpteenth time in order to make him seem more respectable - all seemingly to distract attention from the fact that he is still failing to provide answers to my simple questions, which in the context of his constant bashing, certainly deserve a proper answer. To remind you my questions are:

Liambooth, I think what we all would really like to understand is - 1) if you are a shareholder as you keep claiming, and yet you have all these well-thought-out reasons for thinking the company probably won't be successful, why don't you sell? And 2) given that you are not selling, why do you keep posting negative arguments, aren't you worried that you might affect the share price which would be against your interests?

Simple and clear questions, do you have simple and clear answers? Or should we draw our own conclusions about your motivations?

The Utah revenue is meant to come from selling a licence to Greenfield and/or anyone else (eg Petroteq) for the right to use the technology at an agreed site (potentially the new site), which could be done even before the site is built.

Liambooth, I think what we all would really like to understand is - 1) if you are a shareholder as you keep claiming, and yet you have all these well-thought-out reasons for thinking the company probably won't be successful, why don't you sell? And 2) given that you are not selling, why do you keep posting negative arguments, aren't you worried that you might affect the share price which would be against your interests?

Simple and clear questions, do you have simple and clear answers?

I know, it's not fair. They're now insisting I do 30 positive posts instead of 20 for each night in the 5 star hotel. We're now having tense negotiations and I've threatened to start deramping instead, but we may compromise on 25.

What an absurd comment from booth. Obviously what he writes is absolute nonsense (my only connection with FUM is that I am a shareholder who doesn't like his nonstop bashing and sometimes can be bothered to write a response), but if that is all he has to say then it certainly says something about him.

If I were to follow his lead of how he reacted to some posts he didn't like a few months ago I would be threatening to sue him for libel aginst me. But that of course would be a pretty stupid thing to do.

Remember everyone, booth claims to be a shareholder.....

I don't know how many people saw IE's confession a week or two ago about how he had worked for a hedge fund where he was in a team paid to trash companies' shares but had lost his job. The posts did get taken down quite quickly but have been recorded elsewhere. I think we all need to wish IE congratulations on getting his job back, while remembering to completely disregard all his twisted nonsense.

There are two trials, the main trial and the "human factors" trial, the latter needing only 15 people.

Something up without a shadow of a doubt.....

I believe Bergen are out or very nearly out but it looks like someone else is unloading a large position, possibly one of the recent placees, could be finished soon or a bit longer. After that hopefully we will get the price going up...