RE: Investigating the truth of the court’s runling3 Jan 2024 02:18
Wobble
Thank for backing me up about the reliability of the challenging the Delaware court verdict due to what appearsto have been a failure to correctly interpret the law which precribes the grounds upon which a patent may be invalided, none of which has been shown to have satisfied in our case, because we have no evidence of counsel explaining the law's relaxed terms allowing the correction, at any later date, of clerical errors made in the inventorship details fiven in a patent's original registration filing. I have been talking this through today with my wife, and in in process of vocalising the issue, the huge signifance of overturning the Court's verdict became clearer in terms the of potential conbined cash win, which could include. the reimbursement Cap-XX' legal costs, historical owed royalties, putintive damaged of a scale commensurate with Tesla's market value and profits derived from vehicles built with Cap-XX patented components, very valuable free publicity for Cap-XX because of the inevitable worldwide reporting of a victory against the infamous Tesla, plus the usual reflex copy-cat buying of any small cap company's shares upon investors seeing its price rocket at opeimg by tens of percent or more, which then leads to a surge in finacial press reporting and further interest due to the sensational back-story. When yiu think of it this way, there is an almost unimaginable potential upside. So, thanks again for you comment.