RE: Thoughts on this?12 Jul 2025 18:24
Afc Seagull:
"Have you fallen victim in the past, financially, because of the CEOβs actions?"
No, not this CEO. But other CEOs. I've also witnessed the fallout with other private investors.
"Do you believe that the most prevalent βrampersβ of the stock on the Hive, X, TG etc have Jasonβs ear, and are in on this scam you claim, or is it more the case of the most bullish being the most suckered?"
More being suckered, for certain. I've been there myself with a CEO feeding you a narrative that doesn't play out as planned (whether intentionally or otherwise). I don't think it's possible that they're in on it because with all due respect to the usual names, they're simply not smart enough or well versed enough in Junior Mining to even know what they're saying. You also have to remember, a lot of the hard-core holders are all underwater here.
"Do you believe that Maruβs employees are indeed real?"
Surely the accounts should answer that?
"If they are, is it the fact that they are in on the scam, or, Jason is in fact spinning the plates of your insinuated deceit so well that they donβt realise itβs all a free ride?"
Speaking of spinning plates - Some of these execs will be execs of multiple companies, and are clueless about what's happening anywhere.
"Where do you think the AQSE Corporate Adviser stands in this inferred debacle?"
I don't know how much they read/see. E.g. I imagine they don't do site visits? I imagine they're not scrutinising internal documents, like budget plans?
They don't need to be tricked, because there aren't any real checkpoints? A CEO will say "Here's the grade, Here's the budget plan" - I doubt any advisor is benchmarking that against any external factors.
"Dee, if your right, and Iβm getting fuct here. How many layers of corruption has the CEO engineered to steel my money?"
Not many, is the answer. I get what you're saying: How can this be some magical illuminati level conspiracy involving all levels of the chain etc etc....
It's simple. It more or less starts and ends with the CEO. Take Kinusi as an example. "28% Grade!!!" - Could there have been some chip samples like that? Sure. But isn't it just "alluded" to that this is what's expected across the deposit?
That doesn't require a huge conspiracy. That involves picking up a poor asset (who lets such a high grade copper deposit go so easily? Even if financially distressed, you'll have a queue waiting to buy), jazzing it up and then not drilling it out - Because drills tell the tale, not chip samples and stories.
Also to remember, we've been told about assay returned... We haven't seen the actual assay results, the name of the lab, who collected the assays, who signed them off, and HOW MANY samples were taken. These are all industry standards, and my biggest issue when I first debated JB was that a lot of what he said simply amounted to "trust me, bro", and i kept saying that isn't good enough in the absence