Member Info for Dee12345

Amtech, You should say you were asking me. Not expect me to assume.

Answer:

Neither. The two are not mutually exclusive.

5th February 2021 on AST - RHT99:

"Word on the grapevine we are close indeed, could be a matter of weeks at tops. Lets see if rumours prove true. Welcome RNS this morning and to give you heads up my boys are going to be ready with their wallets so if you fancy selling you'll get the liquidity"

That was the day the shareprice peaked.

It's one thing to ramp, it's another to talk about your millionaire friends, and then state 'your boys' are buying to ramp ordinary shareholders into being your exit liquidity.

So, if you want to talk about 3 year price charts, look no further to your incessant ramping of AST at the time it all went pete tong. And then you disappeared.

You can like or dislike what you like. You can agree or disagree with whatever you like.

But never, ever could I be friends with somebody who uses lies and half-truths to use ordinary shareholders as exit liquidity.

Amtech is an example of someone you could be friends with, yet disagree with.

You're not.

Absolutely. I do have a question for you, RHT99:

Why were you making the following statements on AST back in January 2021:

"I may just disappear now but rest assured the buyers won't."

"My man is managing funds for a group of high net worth investors."

"My man taking them in 50k and 100k batches."

"Nothing price sensitive but if my mate is a millionaire and has another 20 millionaire mates who want to buy, they might tell me, lol"

Then on the 4th February 2021:

"Don't say you didn't have the heads up. Needless to say by now you know who the large block buyers are. And for the record they are not stopping here. MMs ain't got a chance against them. Deep pockets, high net worth a loading. See you folks at 30p very shortly"

That's around a day from where the shareprice hit a peak.

Then it dropped nearly 50% in ONE DAY a month later.

Then it went on to lose 83% from the highs over the course of a year.

1. Who is your Man?

2. Why were you ramping so heavily over at AST near the highs?

3. Why did you disappear immediately after? You weren't seen on LSE for over a year

4. Do you often ramp shares towards the top, and then de-ramp towards the bottom?

5. Did you ever apologise to the people you ramped into those stocks?

6. Did you make up nonsense about these 'millionaire buyers' who dumped?

7. Is this the sort of reason why you post anonymously?

8. Do you not feel this discredits you, and your arguments?

9. Why should anyone feel you're asking genuine questions, or trying to hold management to account based on your own previous posts?

RHT99 - You seem to be taking this very, very personally.

You need to relax, and take a breather.

Just answer the initial points, and it'll all go away.

So now it's not only a case of you being unable to answer clarify your points, you're now unwilling to to even take them back.

Perhaps a third reminder would assist you?

1. You have failed to substantiate MB 'holding the door open' for Kabunga.

2. You have failed to substantiate how Kabunga saw the writing on the wall with The Tanzanian Government, only to work on a different project located in Tanzania.

3. You have failed to substantiate how MB has "completely messed this project up". Can you elaborate on what has been messed up? I already stated that certain things have not been progressed, but can you show what has messed it up?

4. YOU initially brought up Kabunga "Whilst he continues to hammer on about Kabunga". I didn't bring him up. You did.

Answer the questions, prove your points, and we can more on.

I'm not getting personal at all - But you seem to be taking this very, very personally.

You see, I missed out a word.

I made a mistake. I apologised.

You still haven't answered the initial points. You can't apologise, you can't admit you're wrong, and now you want to engage others on new points, which going on previous form - You'll half address.

Admitting you're wrong doesn't mean everything else you say is by default; incorrect.

So answer the initial points.

I'll say it again:

Would you like a yet another reminder?

You have failed to substantiate MB 'holding the door open' for Kabunga.

You have failed to substantiate how Kabunga saw the writing on the wall with The Tanzanian Government, only to work on a different project located in Tanzania.

You have failed to substantiate how MB has "completely messed this project up". You you elaborate on what has been messed up? I already stated that certain things have not been progressed, but can you show what has messed it up?

YOU initially brought up Kabunga "Whilst he continues to hammer on about Kabunga". I didn't bring him up. You did.

Answer the questions, prove your points, and we can more on.

If you don't like circles, try speaking in straight lines.

I meant Kabunga had started dumping after the mining licence was RECEIVED.

Apologies, there was a typo there, by not putting in the word 'received'. This happened around August 2021.

Now, you haven't answered any of the initial points?

Can you please answer the initial points, so we can move on?

It's great that you can point out factual errors, but it doesn't mean you can get away with not answering the initial points.

Would you like a reminder?

You have failed to substantiate MB 'holding the door open' for Kabunga.

You have failed to substantiate how Kabunga saw the writing on the wall with The Tanzanian Government, only to work on a different project located in Tanzania.

You have failed to substantiate how MB has "completely messed this project up". You you elaborate on what has been messed up? I already stated that certain things have not been progressed, but can you show what has messed it up?

YOU initially brought up Kabunga "Whilst he continues to hammer on about Kabunga". I didn't bring him up. You did.

Answer the questions, prove your points, and we can more on.

If you don't like circles, try speaking in straight lines.

So you can't admit you were wrong or mistaken with any of your points.

You brought up Kabunga.

Now you don't like it?

Answer the original point, please.

If you cannot, say so - Then we can move on.

So you haven't admitted a thing?

We're not moving on until you do.

1. "they hadn't applied for the environmental/mining licenses yet" - Kabunga starting dumping AFTER the mining licence. So how can he sell because they haven't applied, when he started selling after they received it? Revisionist history again?

2. "If he sees similar opportunities in the mining/graphite space in Tanzania or elsewhere he'll take it." - Again, what opportunity? YOU, RHT99 said that Kabunga partially dumped because of Tanzanian Government. So why hasn't he dumped a Tanzanian project where he is Chairman?

3. "He was in Volt pre-invasion so don't obfuscate" - Aww... You think you got me there, right?

BEFORE RUSSIA INVADED UKRAINE THEY INVADED CRIMEA. DON'T YOU REMEMBER?

There was almost a decade between the annexation of Crimea and the full invasion. If Kabunga could foresee the Tanzanian Government being a problem and thus, selling Armadale... you'd think he'd be able to see the situation with Ukraine being threatened by their neighbours, having a province annexed, and then having a good 8 years to get rid of the project.

Your points are moot.

Again, admit you're wrong, and we can move onto your other questions.

These revisionist stories of yours are ridiculous, RHT99.

Admit you made up the comment about 'MB holding the door open for Kabunga'.

Admit you could be wrong about it, and it's solely your opinion.

Admit you said Kabunga "He knew the project was not viable as the government was not playing ball and therefore started selling" - Whilst he has a Tanzanian Graphite Project called Bunyu as a company he is Chairman of.

Admit the above statement is contradictory when he didn't sell down or dispose of Bunyu, which is located in Tanzania, when you said he sold down ACP because Mahenge is in Tanzania.

Admit all of that, and we can discuss your other points.

Okay,

So let's get this straight:

You, RHT99 think Kabunga "escaped" ACP because he didn't think Mahenge was viable. Apparently, because Kabunga knows Tanzania well.

Again, you make terrible points.

So, Kabunga left ACP because Tanzanian wasn't viable, so what does he do?

*drumroll, please*...

He goes and works on the Bunyu Graphite Project over at his company Volt Resources... Which is... wait for it...

LOCATED IN TANZANIA!!!

Round of applause for RHT99.

But wait, it gets even better. EVEN better.

Volt Resources has ANOTHER project. Where's that one located?

Wait for it...

*drumroll, please*....

UKRAINE!!!

Mate, it's incredibly difficult to take you seriously.

Forget all of these other points you want to discuss. Let's clarify this one first, and then we'll move on.

So Kabunga was super smart, and Matt Bull held the door open for him.

Holding the door open for him, Matt Bull didn't sell a single share, and actually bought more.

Kabunga sold out, but he then went on to develop projects in Ukraine and Tanzania. But according to you, RHT99, he knows Tanzania well, so why is he developing Bunyu in Tanzania?

The fact is, that Kabunga has been aggressively selling. Usually large sellers leave in off-market transactions. Clearly there were plenty of buyers when he was selling, and Kabunga deliberately sold down on the market.

But hey, you're welcome to re-write history.

You still haven't adequately explained how MB 'held the door open'. Apparently MB received quarterly reports on sells. Okay, so how does that constitute MB 'holding the door open'? Is he supposed to force people not to sell? Can he? No. Rather, you don't have an answer to this. Kabunga aggressively dumped for well over a year. He's not a bastion of morality, or somebody capable of developing a Junior Resource.

Or maybe you mean he released amazing news during the period of Kabunga selling - Did this happen? No.

You say MB has screwed it up. Has things paused? Yes. Has things gone backwards? No.

Personally, I'd rather not see a micro-cap company on the hook for almost $40 Million in infrastructure projects. How does that benefit any of us?

You points are incredibly contradictory, and make little to no sense.

Why would MB be buying more when he could just sell? Why would he want to help out Kabunga, when it's well known (and you should know this) that Kabunga didn't want to develop anything - Only to be a lifestyle company. It's also well known that MB and Kabunga had a falling out.

But let's not look at rumours etc. Let's look at the facts.

Kabunga has around 5 companies. Only Lindian was doing half decent, and even that's dumped heavily.

His Graphite Company VRC is basically at the Death Spiral Finance stage. And this is the apparently smart man you think saw it all coming? The man who invested in Ukraine and again, Tanzania which he 'knew' very well?

Sorry, but these revi

No diversion.

25th April at 11:46 RHT99: "Kabunga escaped through the back door as he knew what was going on"

25th April at 12:05 RHT99: "He created an escape route for him and then shafted the rest"

You make these statements, you fail to back them up, and then you bring up new points.

Today at 16:44 RHT99: "Matt did not see this coming and is now stuck"

Today at 16:44 RHT99: "The project is a desperate attempt to suck in sufficient investors so he can offload his shares. Kabunga did it for two years without notifying..."

So which is it? Did MB hold the door open for Kabunga? Then how did MB not see it coming? Your posts are incredibly contradictory, and this is in the space of less than a week.

Say all you like about red herrings and diversion tactics. You cannot even make your original point coherently.

What you say sounds like a nice argument, but it's no different to those simplistic comments you see on Question Time.

They're ramblings. Nothing more, nothing less.

You're not providing anyone with food for thought - You're trying to come across as being insightful and clever, but your initial rant makes little to no sense.

Make up your mind on what your thesis is, and then people will happily respond.

It's not that your points can't be answered - It's that there is little point.

You won't admit where you're proven wrong, but seek to make a new point instead.

There's a lot to unpack with your nonsense... Including the timing.

But it just feels as though there's very little to be gained in engaging with you.

YOU said MB allowed Kabunga to exit. Prove it.

That's one of your nonsense points that you made, yet can't prove.

Oh, what was the name of your Twitter handle RHT99?

It's not difficult to search for tweets from deleted accounts.

The quality of the decision made would all come down to the quality of the asset - Something I envisage we will shortly find out about.

If we start seeing grades of 20 g/t, I'd be 100% agreeing with you.

I'm expecting to see some grades that make it worthwhile pushing the boat out to buy, possibility for near term revenue, and easy access trucking and milling/tolling.

Show me that? It makes perfect sense. But I'd imagine we'd need to wait for that RNS to make that determination. That being said, the market doesn't seem to be reacting too poorly.

You keep speaking about warrant flippers etc, but I can't imagine the likes of Wasa (or myself) looking at this for quick flips - We've been invested for a while. There wasn't much forward selling - Look at the recent volume.

It's been mentioned here on so many occasions. Mahenge is waiting for infrastructure projects, and it's been mentioned by the company on several occasions that they're still in discussions with the Tanzanian government. I don't know why you're dismissing these things.

As you say, you don't like dilutions, yet you want to see the company exposed to $30 million of infrastructure projects?

Which is it? What would you prefer? Sit quiet in perpetuity? Continue to progress and dilute the entire Market Cap to build roads and power? Try and find a project that can get them cashflow positive?

Your posts aren't making arguments - It's just ranting. That's all.

You rant about Kabunga being given exit liquidity - Show me where and how.

You rant about a 16% dilution - 16% in How many years? every year? or just this one year in the past 3?

One Final point RHT99:

Do you know Jim Price?

You both seem to comment on the exact same shares. Him on Twitter. You on here:

ACP

MXO

STAR

AST

WSG

This is the one thing I hate about some of these forums. Anyone with any agenda can say what they want under a pseudonym.

Amtech - Great find on the other thread. I'll have a look at it, too.

RHT99 - Very pessimistic, which is fine.. But quite incorrect.

You're saying he created an exit for Kabunga? How? By being silent? He could have ramped for the past 2 years to create exit liquidity.

You're saying there's a fundraise: First one in how many years? Remind me the last time they went out to market?

You're saying MB's trying to keep his salary going: So he's paying in £100,000 to then pay himself £100,000. Factor in taxes etc, he's losing money with this argument.

If Kabunga is so smart, why did Volt Resources (Kabunga's Graphite Company) just announce Death Spiral Finance last night? That's what you'd prefer?

Clearly discussions with Tanzanian Government are taking time. Clearly from the progress update, it's holding things up.

I'll wait to see the ins and outs of this Silver project before jumping to conclusions.

if you're concerned over your loss here - Sell out, and put in all in BKT. I mean, that's heavily down too, so you should see parity in gains.

GRL - Remains to be seen

ACP - Progress unfolding, and let's watch it play out.

I too partook in the placing. It doesn't make sense not to when we're seeing progress.

As for HZM... I'm sure I told everyone I could dozens of times to steer clear.

MB is putting his money into ACP, with around £3.5 Million of his own money in total invested. Jeremy Martin took OUT around £8 Million over the years in HZM.

It's relatively simple - If Matt Bull Fails, we fail. If Matt Bull succeeds, we succeed. I really want to see more details about this project. Grades, ore, etc. Then we can all make a fair assessment.

Peter Major is an EMPLOYEE, right?

Are you asking why an employee is selling a project?

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but I think you should just come out and state it.

AmTech,

CEO has pumped in more money than he has taken out.

You can do the maths.

I await your imminent response.