Member Info for Dee12345

Stop being so disingenuous RHT99.

Answer the questions, or don't.

But you said you would, and haven't. I'm not jumping through hoops only for you to have yet another excuse.

Stop moving the goalposts.

When I first asked, you refused to answer until I answered some of your counter questions FIRST. So I answered, knowing full well you yourself would above the topic.

Then I asked again. And again. And you wouldn't provide an answer.

Now you refuse to answer unless I answer on a different forum?

So are you going to answer the questions or what?

You're a liar. You didnt answer a things. RHT99:

Why were you making the following statements on AST back in January 2021:

"I may just disappear now but rest assured the buyers won't."

"My man is managing funds for a group of high net worth investors."

"My man taking them in 50k and 100k batches."

"Nothing price sensitive but if my mate is a millionaire and has another 20 millionaire mates who want to buy, they might tell me, lol"

Then on the 4th February 2021:

"Don't say you didn't have the heads up. Needless to say by now you know who the large block buyers are. And for the record they are not stopping here. MMs ain't got a chance against them. Deep pockets, high net worth a loading. See you folks at 30p very shortly"

That's around a day from where the shareprice hit a peak.

Then it dropped nearly 50% in ONE DAY a month later.

Then it went on to lose 83% from the highs over the course of a year.

1. Who is your Man?

2. Why were you ramping so heavily over at AST near the highs?

3. Why did you disappear immediately after? You weren't seen on LSE for over a year

4. Do you often ramp shares towards the top, and then de-ramp towards the bottom?

5. Did you ever apologise to the people you ramped into those stocks?

6. Did you make up nonsense about these 'millionaire buyers' who dumped?

7. Is this the sort of reason why you post anonymously?

8. Do you not feel this discredits you, and your arguments?

9. Why should anyone feel you're asking genuine questions, or trying to hold management to account based on your own previous posts?

RHT99 has already been rumbled, and has already been proven not to be a straight arrow.

We're still waiting on him to answer some basic questions he has conveniently forgotten... Even AFTER people went out of their way to answer his.

The slightest bit of positivity, and Amtech and RHT99 are ready to pounce.

Wasn't AmTech crying about why the mine was shut?

There's an RNS that explains it, yet all he can do is find something else to moan about.

Silver only outperformed for one period in the 80s when those two chaps tried to corner the entire market.

Other than that? It was a dead decade for Silver.

Less than $8.

Silver Price was less than $2 per Oz in 1982... That might have something to do with it

Answer the questions you've been asked, RHT99.

These grades are phenomenal. Good job nobody listened to your garbage over the past few days.

Over 1,000 g/t AG grades?

I'll take that all day long.

Somebody's been rumbled.

See you in 2027 or something.

I think we have something bullish coming.

As soon as an RNS drops, RHT99 will disappear.

Happens with all sorts of stocks on AIM.

I actually agree with you, Jack10 - The good news is, when the de-rampers turn up out of nowhere means something is brewing!

Here's my honest opinion:

RHT99 shows up on AST Board (and others) ramping it to death with compelling stories. At that point, the stock completely dumps.

RHT99 disappears.

Not RHT99 turns up at ACP near all time lows, ready to tell everyone this stock is garbage. What does this tell me? It tells me that there is likely to be something very positive coming our way.

Look up all of his previous posts, and compare share price charts around the info he provides. I stand by my claims.

A lot of these City types can only do what they do through anonymity. He keeps avoiding the questions surrounding AST and his behaviour there - Yet he expects people here to listen to what he says?

I don't often say these, but RHT99 is a mole to try and induce sellers. That only tells me we have something incredibly positive coming our way.

I'll wait for an RNS, and I'll wait for RHT99 to disappear as soon as it lands. That's how these anonymous types behave.

Answer the questions on your previous behaviour, RHT99.

Answer RHT99:

Why were you making the following statements on AST back in January 2021:

"I may just disappear now but rest assured the buyers won't."

"My man is managing funds for a group of high net worth investors."

"My man taking them in 50k and 100k batches."

"Nothing price sensitive but if my mate is a millionaire and has another 20 millionaire mates who want to buy, they might tell me, lol"

Then on the 4th February 2021:

"Don't say you didn't have the heads up. Needless to say by now you know who the large block buyers are. And for the record they are not stopping here. MMs ain't got a chance against them. Deep pockets, high net worth a loading. See you folks at 30p very shortly"

That's around a day from where the shareprice hit a peak.

Then it dropped nearly 50% in ONE DAY a month later.

Then it went on to lose 83% from the highs over the course of a year.

1. Who is your Man?

2. Why were you ramping so heavily over at AST near the highs?

3. Why did you disappear immediately after? You weren't seen on LSE for over a year

4. Do you often ramp shares towards the top, and then de-ramp towards the bottom?

5. Did you ever apologise to the people you ramped into those stocks?

6. Did you make up nonsense about these 'millionaire buyers' who dumped?

7. Is this the sort of reason why you post anonymously?

8. Do you not feel this discredits you, and your arguments?

9. Why should anyone feel you're asking genuine questions, or trying to hold management to account based on your own previous posts?

RHT99 you haven't answered any of my questions, considering I took the liberty of answering yours.

Some people utilise logic, others utilise sentiment...

And others just whine.

It was one month...

And then he had 559 days in the green to act accordingly.

I'll also bite:

1) What has the management achieved in the past 4 years which justifies taking a salary?

a. Updated the Mine plan to utilise a higher cut-off grade and a lower strip ratio.

b. Commenced testwork on graphite to ensure suitability for purity.

c. Increased the Mahenge NPV8 to $430 Million

d. Completed the testwork with CSIRO

e. Applied for a Mining Licence

f. Proved up to 99.99% purity can be achieved

g. Submitted ESG impact assessment

h. Commenced FEED

i. Received formal approval on ESIA

j. Received Mining Licence

k. Appointed Greg Entwistle who is a phenomenal appointment.

2) I would hazard a guess that it would not make sense to sell down investments, and then use the remaining investments for general working capital. It would be foolish to do so.

3) I'd expect the wider market to want to see more details on the project prior to making judgement. We'll be able to make judgement as we receive further info. I didn't know much beyond there being a silver project. I can't imagine MB is adding garbage projects - But I'll wait for the RNS with information.

4) "We're funded until production" means we're funded on the basis of the projected timelines. You really need this explained?

5) Anything can look imminent, until it isn't. Until it is again. and then it isn't again. Lenders move goalposts. You're telling me you're too naive to know this?

6) Again, do your own homework. I'm not wasting hours trawling through RNS' to help a troll. You do it. Then come back to us with your findings.

Now, please feel free to answer MY initial question, and my questions about you and AST.

I suspect you won't, and you'll deflect.

Answers on a postcard, please.