Doubts about RM?8 Jan 2013 19:37
Just read the article written by Henry Stewart - rubbish - the bloke is making up rubbish from the comfort of his arm chair. No real research and no real facts - just innuendo. Hackney schools may dump RM, always easy to be critical of systems that you don't understand, the main problem was always the disconnect between teachers and IT.
IT moved a lot faster than teachers and teachers wouldn't give the time to catch up. Many teachers thought accessing social communication sites was the cutting edge of IT!
RM were banging their heads against the proverbial from about 1998 which they did their best to overcome. They had a very clever business liaison strategy which supported their bottom line for many years. Schools wanted to cherry pick aspects of the RM stable without taking on board the main student link aspects from the company. This was money that schools thought could be saved by expecting teachers to produce acceptable lesson delivery using IT. Whoops - that was the weak link, middle aged heads without an acceptable understanding of what was being used in their school and teachers therefore not being kept up to speed with acceptable lesson delivery. RM had many options for this - at a price, but the purse string holders would not go that extra yard, saying their staff could / should do that! Whoops back to the weak link again. Employ RM and improve lesson delivery it was possible. I have often been critical of RM but not their enthusiasm for subject support. I am not a shareholder but have observed RM first hand very closely and seen the work they have put into trying to support the education of young people, they really wanted the best for the pupils but couldn't force their model to be imposed - of course, it was up to the customer. So Mr Stewart lets have better and proper research next time or at least acceptable recording of the research and not just an unacceptable spin. DEBS 1