Member Info for DeathStranding

Troajan calling the bottom again. Very good.

Can't think of any reasonable excuse to not release results if they are positive, so continue to think that you are delusional.

Granting PLs hardly price sensitive, unless there is something significant already on them which doesn't appear to be the case. It seems to be public information already (since you know about it). It's the kind of thing that will go into a general update.

Clay Lake results were announced in March. What you waiting for? There have been plenty of results announced since so it seems very doubtful they are "sitting" on meaningful results from there.

In your fantasy buyout or new JV scenario results would absolutely be announced to increase the value. Even in my jaded view of how this business is run there is no rationale whatsoever to withhold news to facilitate some kind of new transaction. What you are saying makes no sense, especially for a company inclined towards overpromotion.

Except of course for the legal requirement to announce price sensitive information to market without delay, rather than save it up for some fantasy big reveal with roast dinner paid promoters.

Blinkered.

So coming up on TEN YEARS since a "positive outcome of the technical and financial studies" and recommendation to proceed to pre-feas, yet no pre-feas was done in all that time. Gold miners around the world have been coining it yet this company has regressed to grassroots exploration. Don't you think that you may not have been told the whole story?

What date was the Tetra Tech recommendation parkez?

Retreating from a clear mine development strategy to speculative exploration (so far without meaningful success) is what has brought the market cap down to £5m. It's priced as a grassroots explorer without a meaningful discovery and the JV so far has been value destructive for investors.

Great news from over 10 years ago. So why wasn't the mine built?

Biox is in the flowsheet and it is needed.

The metallurgy is not "good". It requires BIOX processing which is expensive, and since the initial tests 10 years ago no further work has been reported. The project went into development 10 years ago then stalled. Why?

All the ingredients are not there for a mine. If they were, we'd have a feasibility study by now. Instead, only smoke and mirrors.

Where are these "many potential mines" located? Where is the proof? There is one site with a reported resource, that's it.

Could be worse, you coulda been in HZM today. Holy shamoly. Unlikely that CGNR will drop 60% from current levels, I suppose there's that.

"If I can help others to see a little better the realities ,instead of the blinkered thinking then 5 minutes of my time is well spent....." Quote.

Wise words pedro61. Seems you like a bit of contrarian posting yourself so I think you know where I might be coming from.

Based on that speaker bio it sounds like Professor-of-physiology Conroy will be reliving the glory days. Nothing's happened since the 90s.

This company is having a laugh

"Dodged a bullet". That's hilarious!

Happy to be of service parkez. But the alternative is that AAZ are some kind of dummies for not securing standard exclusivity in their terms with CGNR. I personally do not believe they are dummies. What do you think?

AAZ had exclusivity therefore only way they could announce Demir deal on the same day as AAZ withdrawal is if AAZ allowed CGNR to hold talks with Demir, facilitating an orderly swap of deal for CGNR. Simple. And all discussed here before.

Check your facts. AAZ announcement 25 Feb 2021.

Check your facts pedro61