Member Info for DC2007

Turning over billions....

To lose millions and millions. No one right in the head buys a money-losing machine for anything other than peanuts.

Too much can be read into Frasers' holdings. And Mike's increasing involvement in something isn't necessarily good news for small private shareholders.

Weak grammar is forgivable, Carltt: it's infinitely preferable to the ugly, casual racism which you exude. Coupled with your weird concoction of lies about the composition of those posting, you're as tedious as you are odious.

Been nothing more than big-snooze for ages to me. Breathless, repetitive wiffle — they're craving credibility, yet are far far beyond even parody.

Was certain to be a tenner by dinner-time by the way some were going on. Usual wishful thinking. The Boo board joined in the frisson too expecting read across.

'The information on here is useless, suspect and should not be trusted.'

Kind of you to include a summary of your own hyperbolic rants.

That's a good question Jane on if a holding within an ISA/SIPP wrapper can be transferred broker-to-broker, without transferring the entire ISA/SIPP, and without losing the tax-free status. My Poly is with Jarvis and it's one I'll be asking them.

I searched for this a while ago in HMRC's info about SIPP/ISA and could find no mention of it in the rules. Perhaps more telling was that all the rules implied a transfer would be of an entire account. If it's not possible, perhaps this is where the restriction lies, rather than what brokers decide to offer, or not. I imagine HMRC need to keep tax free investment simple enough to remain manageable, and being able to 'split' holdings held within a single wrapper into multiple wrappers could be simply too complicated to allow. Mightn't be permitted on the grounds that it'd leave too many loopholes, and the excessive complexity it might lead to could provide opportunity for fraud or evasion, or even plain errors.

Technically the cash raised could be enough to make H2 cashflow net in/positiv.. Perhaps that's why they could be confident about stating that.

A cash call is often followed by another in the not too distant future, bit like profit warnings. Denial and saving face usually means businesses underestimate the amount they need (and this from a BoD that only a couple of weeks back said they needed nothing).

ASOS are burning through cash and that £75mn won't carry them that long. Feels like it's going to become a black hole where cash only goes in one direction - that of disappearing.

And yet their English is still better than yours.

Understood west - correction acknowledged.

Not saying it's happening here, but your reasoning is off: have seen directors buy into other companies that are on the brink and soon after in admin or bust.

Today looks like panic selling. But, it'll take more than a couple of really quite small buys from the BoD to improve sentiment and patch their credibility after the shambles of results and cash call.

I wondered if that was maybe a fat-finger; it's had nearly everything else lately.

Big-bloo has no clue what they're talking about. Easiest is to simply ignore their puerile attempts to sow discord.

AIX is currently equivalent to about £2.40; MOEX much nearer to £6.00. With the vote out the way, I wonder if there'll be a flurry of interest from flippers looking to buy at a discount to either of these in London, then sell soon after on a foreign exchange for a quick and easy profit?

The price on AIX has felt as if it's drifting downwards in the past few weeks. It's as if it's equalising with LSE, rather than the other way around, which would have been better.

Poly's website has been unreliable over the past few weeks for me. It usually times out on various IR pages and they won't load. RNS and publications can be retrieved from LSE's (the exchange, not here) & the national storage mechanism, respectively.

That means you've not looked at the T&Cs and are supposing what they might be? Then posting it to be a stirrer. Gives you a little satisfaction in your life to try and antagonise people on a forum. Transparent as a window mate.

Why not tell us where in the T&Cs blue? Lets have a page and paragraph number to corroborate your speculation.

Thanks for posting Echo.