Member Info for Davemate90

Questions. A bit of scepticism. Unless your shouting about how great the product QBT has, most of the time your post will get reported!

It's a joke tbh!

Because common sense is not welcome on this board I'm afraid.

Dooogle/Mrhanji.

You said, "This isn’t just talk or lab work anymore"

I don't know what prn you were reading, but did you miss this bit:

"Including a live demonstration of Method A, which was mining in the Company's lab in Milan." It literally says in the rns...did you even bother to read it?

Also Mikeydj.

Please tell me what part of the below is wrong:

"08:24

🤣🤣 I pretty much posted today's prn on here yesterday..but it doesn't seem to be here anymore. Yet, when FG releases the same stuff it's held as gospel here?

"Vaguely written rns. Couple of bits of jargon and big words, everything positive, possible nda...pretty much the same as Mining Disrupt..rinse and repeat" i wasn't far away at all 🤣🤣🤣"

Mikeydj.

Good morning! MASSIVE update here..surprised that we can still get in for under a penny...it should be £££. Just wait for the American herd to wake up.

😂😂 are things like that more welcome around here?

I just copied something off the QBT website and somehow that's not right either

They couldn't do a live demonstration for everyone in Mining Disrupt, due to not having ndas in place...now they hope to do demonstrations for 10-15 potential customers/partners..how is this? Does this mean everyone who wants to see a demonstration will have to sign an nda? Just seems a little contradicting..that's all. Csn anyone shed any light on this?

I didn't even realise they had a marketing department.

Will someone else be appointed to do Business Development? Otherwise this is a pretty backwards step *in my opinion*

*ricey.

Ricky. You could be right, however something like "first results are promising however costs were more than we expected, and we need to modify the method in order to continue testing, blah blah blah..theoretically..blah blah nda"

Something along those lines I reckon...all my own opinion as per..

I've said it before to keep an eye on the volume..could be a placing thats being forward-sold.

*again, all my own opinion.* seeing as yet another one of my posts got deleted. The lengths people go to when your posts don't fit their agenda. It's a message board,ffs!

Doooogle.

Are we just going to ignore methods a and b? FG definitely knows how to play this doesn't he.

Wonder if a method d will also be announced as well.

Huge numbers..which only matter if it actually works.

Surely you would have had more than theoretical results if it did actually work.

They've had 2 years to confirm of the results work in real time and haven't delivered.

I can sense the next rns/prn will either say "technical issues, so further development is needed..but the results were encouraging"...then I think a raise will be just around the corner..

*my opinion of course, before this gets reported and deleted*

Doooogle.

I think it's quite obvious of what role you have on this board.

I have seen you said: "Another note is QBT have a ton of data to back this up"

This is only "theoretical", if it did work in real life as good as its supposed to, wouldn't at least one of the methods have an agreement in place?

Kk.

Post reported for false and misleading 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Have all the posts gone?

Are people getting them deleted so the number of trades looks better?

Dooogle.

Thank you for taking the time to reply. I agree with you that the board should be used to post your opinions, and people who disagree with them can post theirs.

I enjoy the debate, and again agree that you shouldn't be subjected to insults because someone doesn't share the same view as you.

Dooogle.

The person who has the most obvious agenda here is you.

Are you and mrhanji the same person? Your posts look pretty similar.

Let me guess..you're another one who's read all the ramping drivel from certain posters on the board, and now left holding the bag? Looking for a spike the sp so you can offload?

Dooogle.

Please stop spamming the board copying and pasting the same thing over and over.

I think it's fair to say, you definitely have an agenda here.

Kk.

Fact 1 - you mention patents. They've applied for patents previously- can you say what has happened with those? I am unable to find info.

Fact 2 - QBT have done what wasn't supposed to be done. Only theoretically, and due to ndas we will never know if they have actually managed it. Unless you have information we don't?

Fact 3 - QBT recently presented live demonstrations. Are you sure about that? As per their latest rns. Otherwise why would qbt have to demonstrate again? Surely, it would just be straight to testing?

Fact 4 - on the back of these demonstrations they have gathered loads of interest? Again, are you sure or is this your own opinion? As everyone is entitled to one? I thought they didn't demonstrate at Mining Disrupt, which is why they were hoping to follow up with a number of clients in the future to get ndas in place and then demonstrate?

Qbt seem to want to have ndas in place before even demonstrating anything. Interesting to say the least, don't you think?