RE: short attack5 Feb 2022 18:51
The only people who would have read that would be forum members from here and the other site. I doubt anyone paid any attention to it, and I think they scored an own goal associating it with rats - Doh! and it was probably too long and complicated for most 'investors'. Perhaps they felt more desperate to make this work after the hiding they got in 2020 from the ventilators. I spotted the same characters over on the other board with the same worries that were posted here. I think the short looked almost finished at 60p, but they must have known there was a chance of the Russel announcement, and Bam, hit it hard for 2 days. Day one took 7p off the price, day 2 not sure yet, as looking for late trades on Monday but may have been 5p. What people need to remember is that they only get a few shares from these drops, most of it is their own (borrowed) stock that they sell and have to buy back. So maybe a few people had enough, but it sounded to me like plenty of people were buying too. I think a lot of this stock is in sticky hands, and now possibly more is tightly held. It looks far worse on a chart than it actually is due to a lot of the volume being their own.
Looking ahead: The price is now back to historical levels, yet the company has made a lot of progress in the last 2 years and has a nice wedge of cash from Covid. Zvi is a smart man, to declare 10% buy back at now a 33% discount to the price 1 month ago. Far better use of the cash than paying tax to the Israeli government. Im sure BatM will make steady progress in all their endeavours, but there is also that chance that something hits the sweet spot and boom!
You cant beat these shorters, so the best way is to join them. I shaved 30p off my price thanks to Ennismore, and actually BatM may have been little expensive at 80p, but not at 50p IMO.