Member Info for Daisan

I would be amazed if the plant did not have backup power.

Headancer,

Whilst I think that is not the whole story, I was referring to the fact that the production profile is not currently meeting their nameplate capacity. Reasons for this have been identified and the transformation programme has indicated where they can put in place zero cost processes to increase it this year, if not quite to nameplate capacity. The Q1 production report should give an indication as to how that is progressing. So, management is taking steps to address the issue and, as I indicated, we wait for the outcome.

What is surprising is the very low level of trading since opening so I am not sure that we have seen a full reaction yet. Given the characters involved I suspect many new investors will think twice. However, whilst AB has few followers, PJ has a group of followers who tend to buy in with him both off and on the market so it would hardly be a surprise to see them promote this.

All the rhetoric around the asset valuations and potential is secondary to the £500k disparity between current assets and liabilities. Given that, for the company to make any meaningful progress you would have to say that they probably need at least £1m injection during the course of this year. Given the current market capitalisation that would double the current shares in issue.

As far as I recall, investors chronicle has tipped BMN (I don't receive a copy but it has been posted on here before).

Hargreaves Lansdown operate nominee accounts on behalf of private investors rather than on their own account.

Well, my very primitive calculation gives around 715mtv! I would feel that there had been progress if we keep this up and actually produce more than 700mtv this quarter. I would point out that we are dealing with very little information currently.

NPV rather than NAV I would think.

You have to feel for those shareholders. First failing as SULA (5 years ago their sp was 350p), then failing as ABM (a year ago their sp was 6p) now facing a double whammy of a massively discounted placing (0.5p) and two of the worst company directors on AIM.

He might need the money because every investment I have seen him make has performed abysmally. He is almost as reliable a bellwether as TW.

£10/share would be just over £11bn market capitalisation as there are currently just over 1.1bn shares in issue.

Probably because they all (bar Knuttie) have already got billions and only one of them gives a fig about world poverty.

"3. Stop rewarding yourselves for failure with obscene wages when the majority of your time is spent on CGNR work"

I am not sure that investors in CGNR would agree with that sentiment! Twenty years plus with no progress that I am aware of over there.

Does PG ever make money? Whenever I see him pop up as a holder it seems to be the harbinger of doom for the share price!

Too early? Yes, I think so. I would like to see more volume on upward share price movement.

Good to see some sensible posts about TA arriving. It is a tool, no more, no less. It is far from 100% accurate but is a useful guide for entry/exit points. If somebody has a 100% accurate mechanism for investing in shares then please pass on the secret!

Hmmm. I don't agree with aspects of the synopsis so not sure that I will be signing up for this one.

FekirTrader,

That is just one of these automatically generated reports, the purpose of which is to market someone's services. The only positive thing I would say is that the report makes sense as they usually cut and paste aspects that don't make any for AIM listed companies. The implication is that BMN is maturing as a company and actually has real data to insert in these kind of reports.

Very disappointed. There were some gems about machine learning in there that everybody would have been intereste..... Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Uncrossing trade. LSE uses that as the price as it is a matched trade.

Possible explanations:

1. Video being prepared for delivery tomorrow (unusual considering these are pretty basic)
2. An error (seems unlikely)
3. Something was said in the video that is not yet in the public domain but will be when released (I suppose this happens although I can't recall seeing this before)
4. Zaphod is just this guy, you know?

All things considered, I suspect 4.