Member Info for dai2belts

@Silverlight, you need to check through your notes

@Harry, if you don't have a link to the rumour, then it likely you are lying so no better than Hamilton..

@Harry, do you have the link to the placing rumour ?

If CSS are behind the down trend, and are sharks then they may try buying back some once they kill the selling pressure... Its a long drill campaign so plenty of time to sell into the rise, its almost a 3 bagger back to IPO price..

I suspect the trolls will go quiet once the rise from the bottom starts..

Are you going to buy on permit news if thats before that placing you are suggesting ?

If you doubt anyone selling reads the BB, then why do you post so much, the majority of todays posts are yours..

Harry you are here to get the price down, thats why your posts dominate the BB, if you were warning people you would say your bit then get on with your day...

So have you decided if its a placing or suspension, can't be both

They could have loaned shares, and already sold creating this low.. Once the lock-in ends transfer their shares to the loaner...

And to think labour plan on investing billions in pension money in markets where loaning of shares, forward selling and shorting are all legal... All activities carried out in a way Joe public doesn't even notice

Gone quiet, probably can feel eyes burning his back lol

Sounding like DM with the weather excuse, to extreme to survey but fine to timetable a drill ?

But 1 & 2 concern me more....

It just seems like a long time with all the noise, it was only Jan 10th that we had the delay news..

If Hamilton is telling all then there is nothing to worry about, but if the reasons given for the delay are points 3 and 4, which are a consequence of with held 1 and 2....then ?

But thats conspiracy thinking.....

Always wondered why he listed main market and not AIM, but no NOMAD perched on ones shoulder ...

Shame this was not ASX, there shares can be suspended to protect...

Maybe that rumour is for that reason

Second thoughts, Harry's posts make up the majority while clearly posts have been deleted..

I also see Harry commenting on another account being removed...?

So it looks like others being removed helping Harry's posts to dominate the BB

New guy must be getting reported as many of the posts although still visible can't be replied to..

They are achieving new all time lows, at least I think 0.625p is the lowest..

Odd that the new low coincides with the greens being out and the best chances of a farmout..

Thats one old looking bunch of directors, probably nothing to prove and all pensioned up..

just stumbled on it, just some of those practices we see trading stocks..

gex ipo, its been approved, so we accept its legit, even though supporting doc obscure in places.

he1, tm1, intra-company loans

syme, used the big 4, so people believed its product/service met accounting regs, but nothing has materialised so maybe not

holding companies in africa, while uk listed & registered virgin island, all part of poor performing aim companies

some psd off poster commented about dodgy dealings of a ceo with the name bongo, and something about bongo bongo ways not being acceptable, while people reported him for being ****** i had quick google...

turned bongo was the surname of a president who said something like corruption isn't a word in africa lol..

omar bongo

he once told an interviewer: "don't speak to me about corruption. that is not an african word."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jun/09/obituary-omar-bongo

It is long so only read the start and end, the 5 points at the end are very interesting.....

https://thetricontinental.org/dossier-how-neoliberalism-has-wielded-corruption-to-privatise-africa/

Interesting figures

Estimated production of 380,000 tons of spodumene concentrate annually, refined into 50,000 tons of battery-grade lithium hydroxide – enough to power one million EVs.

I wonder how many tonnes rock ?

https://sputnikglobe.com/20250126/catastrophic-fire-at-australian-lithium-mine-raises-strategic-tech-mineral-industry-concerns----1121501342.html

Maybe 2m is a mid point derived from computer modelling, from the data taken so far

I had a look at a vertical well design document(PANR)), one of the parameters was "spacing" which appeared as width of the area around the bore, so I guess the spacing between wells. At the moment there is just one, so maybe it could change..

Or maybe for a single well there could be an estimated furthest point from which oil will likely drain into the bore, based on current data ?

Then from another article there was spacing between stimulated zones along the vertical, maybe thats to be decided later...

I am relatively new to this, if you can explain I will listen.