RE: Checked original 17th dec rns18 Jul 2022 13:31
Hunky
With respect, I think you may have things a little muddled in your post. There is no order of $40m ‘only’ a framework agreement which could deliver in excess of $40m by end of 2024, if the numbers indicated by the consortium are in fact ordered. The first (and only) reported under under that agreement was the 500 units rns’d on 15th June. It is clear, in my opinion, that the contract reported on 13th July is an entirely separate and additional contract with another distributor (not the consortium) this time with a firmer value of $16m over 4 years. So, I don’t think we can deduce a specific number of further orders under the consortium’s framework, but we have been given an estimated value over time. What I think we can deduce, given the exclusivity conditions referred to in the 17th Dec rns, is that the consortium deal probably didn’t cover Argentina. The latest does. The other interesting point is that there was some disappointment that it took 6months to get an order for 500 units under the framework contract with the consortium and I notice that in the 13th July rns, that they are more careful to manage expectations by making it clear that revenues won’t start to flow until early 2023 and will ramp up more strongly in 2024. In other words, this deals take some time to ramp up, and we should not be concerned about the apparently slow start to orders under the 17th Dec rns. Totally agree with your comment about our market cap, except I think it’s looking silly already!