Member Info for Ctw2014

One thing is for sure, moaning non stop here will simply reinforce the negative sentiment (which may be the aim for some) and make it harder for this share to recover. Crying over spilt milk never got anyone anywhere, and it won’t get rid of Ed either. The only ones it will help are those who want to get in or top up even lower. Best hope for investors with history here is to move on and give the future a chance.

Lol

You know you are on a crap exchange when a company sp moves 4% on about 70 quids worth of trades. These silly bot trades for a few quid ought to be banned.

Nothing to stop Ed buying now. He can’t be inside on the Leap deal now it’s in the public domain.

On past form, we should get a trading update before Xmas. Maybe in a week or so.

If so, at least it’s positive leaking!

Without wishing to pick an argument here, it always amazes me that people invested somehow think it’s useful in a public forum to **** off their own investment (or it’s management) especially when buyers are already few and far between.

It’s actually “fount of all knowledge”

I think he stopped using all forms of social media but as far as I know he still holds here.

The Q&A that has indeed only recently been uploaded to the Investor Meet Company website, consists only of the questions that were answered at the presentation. I know this because they are there because I emailed the website 3 times chasing the answers to questions. On the first two occasions they apologised and said they would chase Seed. On the third occasion they put these up on a better than nothing basis having failed to get anywhere with Seed. Pathetic really, and I suspect they simply couldn’t be ****d to wade through the no doubt numerous questions from hacked off investors.

I like the link up via Overhaul to Microsoft’s Supply Chain Centre.

First you undertake a strategic review of the options (first stage due to complete 30/12) then you devise a plan. Not the other way around.

It is quiet but in a way that’s good. Most are holding and waiting for news. I am still betting on a trading update soon, if not this month, then before Xmas.

At the end of the answer to the question about what was happening on Leap (during the InvestorMeetCompany Q&A on 7th September) Ed confirmed it was still the aim to get it done by the end of the year. Let’s see.

Do people really think the directors read these bulletin boards, still less respond to comments? Come on, get real. Last year we had a trading update mid December, so hopefully we will get some news then.

Interesting that Paul Ryan will report to Fionan Murray, given the latter is now supposed to be heading up the Labskin/Skintrust Division.

Always welcome

…… is the quality of intellectual debate. Jeez.

Well, frustrating or no, I decided to top up this morning at what, hopefully, will turn out to be a bargain price. We will see. For the last couple of years at least, as Starcom, the board put out a trading update a couple of months after publishing the interims (published about a month later this year) so, if past form is anything to go by, we could get an update this month and, if that is positive, we might well get a bit of a bounce from here. Fingers crossed.

Quite apart from the other benefits obvious from this RNS, the higher quality product resulting from the simplified process vindicates Keith’s decision not to rush concluding offtakes. He has publicly stated that it is in our interests not to do so because terms are improving as time goes on, but he has obviously had to keep quiet about this new process until now. Clearly, with a better product, he can negotiate even better terms for offtakes. Well done Keith!