RE: How about that7 Oct 2020 11:22
yeah that's slightly frustrating, given how close it was to my target point, now i have the added concern if it does go back to that, why... some more concrete bad news, and do i still want to add more if that's the case?
Whilst i would not have used the words "i don't care about" in relation to the RNS content, a valid point was raised, and a question has arisen from that, the RNS is a news update, and as such should be heeded, digested and considered in context, it will not however have full contract clauses mentioned/explained, until such time as they are enacted and become relevant. So, with that in mind the question raised is then, have Lind called the debt based on something in the RNS (which is hard to see give it's content) or something that has not been said but implied, or do they have an entirely different ulterior motive?
We've all seen RNS releases where a considerable amount of reading between the lines was needed to see the information given (or not), usually,following some later release, and when looking at it with hindsight.
The price fluctuation/dip today, fully expected after an RNS such as we had after hours, hence why i was hovering on this this morning, and not trusting the limit buy I had set, because of the BS spread, that circa 75-100% spread, was disgusting MM manipulation in my eyes, and should have been half that, but I think they took the opportunity to tree shake, and now we're seeing big buys coming back in after the dust settles.