Member Info for cryptochump101

Not at all MAB, I’m comfortable with my holding here but have no intention of committing any more money here. I’d wager that there’s no sale announced next week though.

Are you the poster who’s convinced NN are buying us for around 80p a share?

Panino, you stated the following In November

“Sale complete is more certain than ever.” Do you have a timeline for this “certain sale”

Sandwell, for you to state that with literally no evidence of your claims is quite laughable, and not without ankatant lying. Of course, you could explain why it’s a smokescreen abd we’ve been sold but we both know you’re unable to support your lie.

A share price of 2.31p showed confidence by investors?

Stretch, how long have you been posting here under your various monikers? Who were the rampers / derampers of the day when you set up your first moniker?

Directors own less than 20% of shares

Makeabundle there are so many presumptions in your last post based on no facts and some extremely optimistic hopes. If you believe the board are touting EUA for sale at £1 per share I really think you have a word with yourself

Queeld shares at today’s price are worth around £4m if not more surely, that must be worth going to court for surely irrespective of what they believe the company is worth. Why would anyone walk away from that no of shares if they believed they had ownership of them.

How many I.D’s has Stretch had?

Richard, what do you have against Indians? You frequently use it as a means to insult Treading Carefully and like to use his supposed real name as a means of intimidation. How do you know the supposed identity of TC?

Did your “tea” find any link between this new Kazakh company and EUA? What have you seen or heard that thinks this will increase by x20?

You had best tell Dimitryreacts that then as he claims to have found a link between the Chairman of the new company & EUA

Is Mac calling himself a prophet, good god indeed!!

Mac im pretty sure that other posters have noted that you stubbornly claimed the invasion would never take place despite it being obvious at the time. I’m not sure your opinions on military or political

z matters can be taken seriously, no mattter what you claim to have stated previously.

That because COPL was suspended for different reasons so as I said standard wording evidenced by the others also suspended for delayed accounts.

Gecko, that wording is standard, BCE have also issued one this morning

The sp then becomes whatever price you can get someone to buy your shares from you off exchange. PI’s rarely do well in such instances.

It’s something I’ve considered could happen, with the odd timing of the suspension giving the bod an excuse to say they gave shareholders more than a whole trading day to get out prior to the suspension coming into play.

Itsouthere, are you posting on the correct board? £2.16 would give us a mcap of around £7bn if not more

What would be the contents of this RNS? I’d wager heavily against one, certainly not one with anything of substance or beneficial to shareholders.

The thing that got me with CS was how he just dismissed the Rosgeo JV which they placed shares to raise £26m from memory to a simple, “ yea that’s not happening anymore”with no further explanation.