RE: NT1 and NT2 remediation costs29 Apr 2020 08:48
Good morning Ufufuo. In relation to your figures on NT2 and without questioning the validity or otherwise of the figures ($4m) it was suggested that due to the additional complexity of NT2 over and above NT1 associated with cleaning up the "mud" damage, the terrific gas pressures and also a re-evaluation of the drill that indicated that it was not in exactly the optimum place, the costs would be more than indicated above BUT that notwithstanding that just as importantly, the return on the investment may not be that high. They know that they can get 17 mscfd from NT2 already and why spend another $4 (which I think is too low btw) if that might only increase the flow rate by, say, another 10 mscfd. If, by spending $17.5m, drilling in an optimal location and without the associated complications they could get 75 mscfd? The ROCE offers a far more attractive investment drilling a second well.
That said, AEX have always been cash strapped - now that APT are in the driving seat they may believe that $4m is small change and run with it anyway.