RE: Bonkers vs. Rampers4 Dec 2025 13:10
As Rob had replied, curiosity got the better of me so i unfiltered Bonkers to read the whole thread. What a mistake that was.
"Artar have been patient , agreed , but let's be honest they have had huge discounted exploration costs which the kefi shareholders have paid into , and for those 10s of millions to the projects the kefi sholedholder has paid into , they have effectively PAID to see those projects dilluted with no return"
It's not that Artar have been patient. They have funded the majority of the exploration and the ownership has proportionally adjusted.
Artar have not had huge discounted exploration costs. They have paid for 85% of the exploration.
Kefi shareholders have not paid to see projects diluted with no return. They haven't been paying! As a result, Kefi simply has a smaller piece of a much bigger pie.
".....theres a chance kefi could lose the lot against their will"
Kefi would be bought out at a fair market valuation that would be many times what they have invested.
Qnard : As you began this thread, how do you view this post by Bonkers? What do you make of what is deliberately false & misleading statements? Why do you think they say such things?
Needless to say, they are back on filter