Member Info for crawshaw

Gary also said QGP had paid VLRM as per the agreed terms so I'd take anything he says with a pinch of salt.

"I know what’s going on here, always have."

>>>>

"As we haven’t heard anything different, I’m going with it’s been paid."

Sure sounds like it Gav 👍🏼

It states "to be received today" - this is future tense Gav 🤦🏻‍♂️

Gav, you appear to be the only person that agrees with yourself and can't see the glaring errors. If you can't interpret past and future tense, there's no hope.

Enjoy the ride.

Oh Gav, you're having a really bad day aren't you?

"Thee RNS on the 10th was published at 2.07pm.

That might suggest that the first payment had been received."

RNS clearly states 'with the first instalment TO BE RECEIVED today.'

---------------------------------------

"As we haven’t heard anything different, I’m going with it’s been paid."

Thursday 16th RNS - "has received PART PAYMENT of the contracted $300,000 from QGP."

----------------------------------

"As the RNS was published last Friday with a first payment to be received that day and the whole amount within the NEXT 4 business days, that would take them up to the 16th which is when the RNS you refer to was published."

The RNS actually states (without your twisting)

'the US$300,000 cash element of the coupon is being paid in instalments over the next 4 business days, with the first instalment to be received today.'

This clearly indicates April 10th as the fist of the 4 business days. Which takes us to the 15th, not the 16th as you suggest

"Stop making wild accusations and look at factual evidence"

>>>

Why did the CEO publicly state on April 11th "QGP has paid us per the agreed terms." which we now know was categorically false?

This is factual Gav, evidenced by April 16th' RNS

"Thee RNS on the 10th was published at 2.07pm.

That might suggest that the first payment had been received."

RNS clearly states "with the first instalment TO BE RECEIVED today."

Really embarrassing Gav.

It what's known as an example Gav.

The RNS actually states (without your twisting)

"the US$300,000 cash element of the coupon is being paid in instalments over the next 4 business days, with the first instalment to be received today."

This clearly indicates April 10th as the fist of the 4 business days. Which takes us to the 15th, not the 16th as you suggest.

Gav,

Why was April 10th' RNS title "Coupon Payment Received" when no money had been received whatsoever?

Why did the CEO publicly state on April 11th "QGP has paid us per the agreed terms." which we now know was categorically false?

Gav,

"As the RNS was published last Friday with a first payment to be received that day and the whole amount within the NEXT 4 business days, that would take them up to the 16th which is when the RNS you refer to was published."

Friday 10th - $75,000

Monday 13th - $75,000

Tuesday 14th - $75,000

Wednesday 15th - $75,000

"As we haven’t heard anything different, I’m going with it’s been paid."

We have heard though Gav?

Thursday 16th RNS - "has received PART PAYMENT of the contracted $300,000 from QGP."

It's literally there, in black and white.

Like I said, really embarrassing.

"US chatter" as of late - https://stocktwits.com/symbol/VLRMF

Cimbom, looks like the largest transfer was ~$500?

This is really embarrassing Gav 😩

I think it's you that needs to read the RNS again Gav. They confirmed yesterday via RNS that only PART of the $300k had been received.

Are you serious Gav? From YESTERDAY's RNS;

"has received PART PAYMENT of the contracted $300,000 from QGP."

Would you consider the CEO publicly stated something completely untrue 'borderline illegal'?

"QGP has paid us per the agreed terms."

So the CEO publicly stated something completely untrue?

Naysayer, what date was that message sent?

"QGP has paid us per the agreed terms."

????

"Some of the things that have been said in here are borderline illegal."

Bash' unauthorised financial advice?

PP1's lies and made up nonsense?

"The issue is this is not tier 1 and tier 2 instead. Again you would think that a company with $20bn in gold assets would know the difference?"

It's fairly typical for scuba diving instructors to not know the difference, I believe.