Member Info for countingcards

The same as the Patisserie Valerie news today from 7am. What affect did that have?

Not sure why LA why you think anyone is interesting in your trading strategy. You buy so what, you sell so what. Frustrating? yes, simply because leeches keep selling the price down and then disappear, giving the impression the company is not anything more than a short term trading stock.

I am so hoping the company suspends this at a time least expected for anyone and catches a lot posters like yourself who need to tell us all what time they shower, what they eat the latest book they read, or what they think about the company when all they are doing is trading it.

A lot of good people can easily be swayed by what is said on here, and at the moment (and I hope the person in question is reading this on twitter) the company has been informed of a couple of tweets that have gone out and are now taking advice on the next step. There is a limit to what can be said and what steps over the line needs to be dealt with.

One of the derampers has just had their buy advertised.

4,078,333 buy at 0.95p registered at 8.36am this morning.

Joking aside well done to the buyer. Thats only 20 times above NMS

Looking forward to 8am as well.

MisterPositive

The conversion of the 1.625m on Friday had nothing to do with the EUR9.9m Bonds

This is what it is in reference to

The Board of Clear Leisure (AIM: CLP) announces that it has allotted and issued
1,625,000 new ordinary Clear Leisure shares on conversion by two bondholders of
the 2010 7% Bonds

Dear all

First of all apologies for my posts on here yesterday. I was suspended till this morning so was unable to make any apology till now. I apologise to both the BB and to LSE. It is/was not my intention to ramp any share. I brought to the attention something the market had failed to pick up on immediately and would have been an opportunity for some to buy cheaply.

The people who requested the ban, I would like for them to think out of the box for a moment. They have to be able to distinguish between a ramp and what would be information not yet released but in the public domain. At the point of my post I actually said it was off topic and at no time did I ask anyone to buy. My own opinion is some of those requesting a ban feel upset that I may have taken away their own game plan and potential audience. Some of them even appeared on the investment I spoke about and began to deramp. It again shows the kind of person they are. Are they helping you or themselves? We have all been on the wrong side of a ramp so that is the last thing I wanted to do.

Nevertheless I hope it’s an important lesson for all and I hope we all gain from our investments.

Dear all

First of all apologies for my posts on here yesterday. I was suspended till this morning so was unable to make any apology till now. I apologise to both the BB and to LSE. It is/was not my intention to ramp any share. I brought to the attention something the market had failed to pick up on immediately and would have been an opportunity for some to buy cheaply.

The people who requested the ban, I would like for them to think out of the box for a moment. They have to be able to distinguish between a ramp and what would be information not yet released but in the public domain. At the point of my post I actually said it was off topic and at no time did I ask anyone to buy. My own opinion is some of those requesting a ban feel upset that I may have taken away their own game plan and potential audience. Some of them even appeared on the investment I spoke about and began to deramp. It again shows the kind of person they are. Are they helping you or themselves? We have all been on the wrong side of a ramp so that is the last thing I wanted to do.

Nevertheless I hope it’s an important lesson for all and I hope we all gain from our investments.

Dear all

First of all apologies for my posts on here yesterday. I was suspended till this morning so was unable to make any apology till now. I apologise to both the BB and to LSE. It is/was not my intention to ramp any share. I brought to the attention something the market had failed to pick up on immediately and would have been an opportunity for some to buy cheaply.

The people who requested the ban, I would like for them to think out of the box for a moment. They have to be able to distinguish between a ramp and what would be information not yet released but in the public domain. At the point of my post I actually said it was off topic and at no time did I ask anyone to buy. My own opinion is some of those requesting a ban feel upset that I may have taken away their own game plan and potential audience. Some of them even appeared on the investment I spoke about and began to deramp. It again shows the kind of person they are. Are they helping you or themselves? We have all been on the wrong side of a ramp so that is the last thing I wanted to do.

Nevertheless I hope it’s an important lesson for all and I hope we all gain from our investments.

Dear all

First of all apologies for my posts on here yesterday. I was suspended till this morning so was unable to make any apology till now. I apologise to both the BB and to LSE. It is/was not my intention to ramp any share. I brought to the attention something the market had failed to pick up on immediately and would have been an opportunity for some to buy cheaply.

The people who requested the ban, I would like for them to think out of the box for a moment. They have to be able to distinguish between a ramp and what would be information not yet released but in the public domain. At the point of my post I actually said it was off topic and at no time did I ask anyone to buy. My own opinion is some of those requesting a ban feel upset that I may have taken away their own game plan and potential audience. Some of them even appeared on the investment I spoke about and began to deramp. It again shows the kind of person they are. Are they helping you or themselves? We have all been on the wrong side of a ramp so that is the last thing I wanted to do.

Nevertheless I hope it’s an important lesson for all and I hope we all gain from our investments.

Dear all

First of all apologies for my posts on here yesterday. I was suspended till this morning so was unable to make any apology till now. I apologise to both the BB and to LSE. It is/was not my intention to ramp any share. I brought to the attention something the market had failed to pick up on immediately and would have been an opportunity for some to buy cheaply.

The people who requested the ban, I would like for them to think out of the box for a moment. They have to be able to distinguish between a ramp and what would be information not yet released but in the public domain. At the point of my post I actually said it was off topic and at no time did I ask anyone to buy. My own opinion is some of those requesting a ban feel upset that I may have taken away their own game plan and potential audience. Some of them even appeared on the investment I spoke about and began to deramp. It again shows the kind of person they are. Are they helping you or themselves? We have all been on the wrong side of a ramp so that is the last thing I wanted to do.

Nevertheless I hope it’s an important lesson for all and I hope we all gain from our investments.

knicol not traded, they have been alloted at 4p. So someone with sticky hands has got them. Question how long before RNS?

I agree when it blatantly has on the document that 4p has been paid. Why anyone would sell at this level is beyond me. Maybe they are just traders by nature, and cannot see what has just happened. Anyone reading see the link posted by RKB.

This has a long way up to go.

Like I said check my earlier post on CLP. its taking off.

whoever sells now at this level needs their head testing. This has got to be cleared up although the document is there in black and white.

Too right!!! this needs an RNS to confirm. This is not a typo either.

Price in market right now is 0.7p mid, and this announcement shows 4p issue price.

Lets see how the rest of the day pans out. Total shares are also showing an increase of 1,625,000, on the document.

RKB

Yeah that's interesting! I have just seen the same document after your post. That's not a mistake and its a correct document, issued today. Hopefully we find out very very soon!

I would like if someone who sees this as negative on here or who regularly posts on twitter to explain to me why this news today is 'bad' (daniele Neale, courtesy of twitter as an example). There is so much rubbish flying about this morning. The only thing in my opinion is there a little bit more of a delay.

I am with you SURPRISED. Word for word what you said is exactly how I see it. All I ask is those who are not happy with today to drop writing about their own personal trading mistakes for a moment and come clear on what is the matter with the today's RNS? how has it changed things? thanks.

Spary1

Get your popcorn drink and whatever else, sit back relax its about to get very interesting! Watch this space.

The clue 9005 is 17th 18th 19th and............20th!!! I know you are not stupid and you probably already know what I am getting at, but this is one poster who you cannot send off chasing shadows while you convince others. I will let you carry on with your 'work.'

9005Nelson good name!

Max

Take your pick mate. It could be a number of news but I agree bringing Ondaland home would be a home run. I think also the guy from Fortune Cookie must realise today these guys are not messing so delaying is simply not an option anymore. The land is a win win, and then what comes WITH the land is another potential home run! Big Clue on the 20th September as to why the price is where we are now but won't be soon.