RE: From the canaccord research note,17 Aug 2022 12:45
@Aandi: "At Billingham they aren't ready for offtake agreements yet?", "Again check out velocys timelines,"
And that is exactly the point, We can't secure offtake agreements, we need changes to planning requests, we need the FEED to be completed, all of which are subject to change (and likely to change), and therefore we can't secure the business case and subsequent financing, remembering that DP was supposed to be the financing guru that would sort all those issues, we don't see many options in his toolkit other than the begging bowl to shareholders over and over again.
So at Billingham we failed to get the first throw of the die over the line because the economics changed over the project lifetime, so are having another go, but the timelines aren't any different so what is to say we get another two years down the line, something changes in the market and round and round we go again, all the time having desperately needed capital tied up in these projects. Not being a "Single project company" as DP likes to point out is all well and good if the projects aren't stretching your finances.
EQT technology is reportedly the answer to the global warming challenge, Global energy crisis, net zero targets,
DPs hot air has warmed the globe more than the technology has cooled it, the only zero we actually see from DP is the one in the "Projects Delivered" column on the company reports.
Are the MDCs coming online going to resolve these financing issues, due to the extremely diverse nature and size of the projects thats unlikely. Will they drive numerous other 1-2MW plants into the "pipeline" we hope so, but the MDCs are almost irrelevant when looking at the large projects currently on the books, they will demonstrate the technology in the field but realistically it's all about the commercials and at the moment that is the stumbling block, will a 1.0MW MDC convince any investor the commercials scale to 20-25MW is the question